Getting a Little Personal . . .

A dictionary definition of Person is:
   [from Middle English persone, from Old French, from Latin persona, literally an actor’s face mask, hence a character, person, probably from Etruscan phersu, a mask]
   1. A human being, especially as distinguished from a thing or lower animal; individual man, woman, or child.
   2. [Chiefly British] an individual regarded slightingly, as one of a lower status.
   3. a) a living human body.    b) bodily form or appearance [to be neat about one’s person].
   4. personality; self; being.
   5. Grammar: a) division into three sets of pronouns and, in most languages, corresponding verb forms. the use of which indicates and is determined by the identity of the subject.   b) any of these sets.
   6. [Archaic] a role in a play; character
   7. Law: any individual or incorporate group having certain legal rights and responsibilities
   8. Theology: any of the three modes of being (Father, Son, and Holy Ghost) in the Trinity

A dictionary definition of (Latin) Persona is:
   [a mask, especially as worn by actors in Greek and Roman drama]
   1. role, part, character, person represented by an actor
   2. in general: the part which anyone plays
   3. a personality, individuality, character

   In Greek and Roman drama, the same actor could play more than one role (provided that the roles did not require being on the stage at the same time) using different facial masks and clothing—and, of course, speaking with a different voice.
   There was an old custom of placing at the beginning of the text of a play a “Dramatis Personae,” a descriptive list of the characters in the play, not of the players themselves.

   All this has something to do with how we understand the blessed Trinity, often described, as “one God in three divine persons.”
   The way this sounds in contemporary language is very different from how it would have sounded many long centuries ago.
   Should Father, Son, and Holy Spirit be more understood in the relatively modern sense of the word as distinct and separate individual persons?
   Or, should they be more understood, from the long ago meaning of “person,” as referring to three different masks, aspects, roles of the same player?
   Actually, it’s not an either-or situation; it’s more like a blend of both these and other understandings as they have evolved over the centuries.
   Sometimes we refer to things like this as a “mystery”—not in the sense of a modern “Who-done-it?” but more as something that we somewhat, but not fully, understand.
   In that, we’re a lot like the description that Shakespeare put into the mouth of Macbeth: “Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more.”
   In the great drama of creation and existence, you could say that we are somewhat old-fashioned in that we are clearer about the Dramatis Personae, the descriptive list of all the characters in the play of life, then we are about the players themselves.
   Anyway, we don’t have to know everything —and that exceeds our abilities in any case. But we do know for sure about the love of God for each of us and the work of God for our salvation!


6 August 2023

The Possessions Trap

In the Gospel According to Matthew there is a story about a religiously observant and law-abiding young man who spoke with Jesus about how to be better (Mt 19:16-24).
. . . Jesus said to him, “If you wish to be perfect, go, sell what you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.” When the young man heard this statement, he went away sad, for he had many possessions. Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Amen, I say to you, it will be hard for one who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for one who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.
   Notice that the rich young man “had many possessions,” not necessarily a lot of money—that’s why Jesus counseled him to sell off some of his possessions if he needed cash and give it to the poor.
   Notice, too, that he wasn’t necessarily being selfish or greedy about his possessions. It’s just that a lot of possessions requires a lot of attention and concern.
   Just take, for example, having a nice and relatively new car—it needs a lot of care and attention. Suppose you buy or rent a house or apartment; it requires a huge amount of attention and work—and maybe further expenditures—before you’re comfortably settled in.
   You know, I think it is often more the things that are cherished, vitally needed or not, or the matters that require our expending a lot of time and effort—and maybe cash, too—that have a hold on us (even though we presume that we have a hold on them!)
   Years ago, some of my friends collectively gave me a very nice gift for my fiftieth birthday: a computer and printer. Compared to now-a-days it was a big, awkward pile of bulky mechanisms and wiring with very limited computing power.

   But I was fascinated by computers and gave my new possession tons of attention—and this has never ended! Computers seem to be relatively short-lived, and new models and improvements seem never to cease being made available.
   I’m computer-knowledgeable, but I have expended—and still do—huge amounts of time and effort to resolve problems and keep up with changes and innovations.
   I’m not like the old Disney cartoon character “Scrooge McDuck”, rolling in delight in all his money, but taking care of things, devices, tools, and the like absorb a huge percentage of my time and effort, whether for others or myself.
   The point of this reminiscence is that it’s not so much cash and bank accounts that the Lord is warning about—it’s letting ourselves be so absorbed in the care of possessions, of things, of devices, of tools, even of careers that can make it hard to enter the kingdom of heaven.
   Curiously, it’s not so much quantity that matters. It’s possible to have more greed and possessiveness over one tiny little thing than some people have over great fortunes and possessions.
   I’ve always been fascinated by and attracted to St. Francis of Assisi. But it seems almost too easy to do something like divest oneself of all possessions and trust completely in the providence of God and the generosity of others.
   It’s hard to have many possessions and use them sensibly and generously, and it’s also hard to resist giving them undue attention. But, due care and usage of them may require more sacrifice than just giving them all up!


14 May 2023

Perfection

“Perfect” is an adjective with a wide variety of usages. For example, it can mean,
 – conforming absolutely to the description or definition of an ideal type,
 – excellent or complete beyond practical or theoretical improvement,
 – exactly fitting the need in a certain situation or for a certain purpose,
 – entirely without any flaws, defects, or shortcomings,
 – accurate, exact, or correct in every detail.
   There’s an old joke about two children, one incorrigibly pessimistic and the other incorrigibly optimistic. One Christmas their loving parents tried hard to break them of their habits.
   The parents filled one room with a magnificent Christmas tree, beautifully decorated, surrounded by a huge quantity of gifts. They invited the pessimist to open the door. He did and then burst into tears. “Look at the angel figure atop the tree,” he cried, “it’s crooked!”
   They prepared another room for the optimistic brother. He opened the door, saw nothing but straw and manure all over the floor, and clapped his hands with delight, saying, “Where’s the pony?”
   No human construction, situation, assessment, or communication is 100%, absolutely perfect and beyond improvement. (Remember, we’re not the Creator, only his creations.)
   No matter what we attempt and try to do and achieve, there will always be pessimists who will call attention to our flaws, limitations, or incompleteness. And, conversely, there will always be optimists celebrating our assistance, successes, and achievements.
   God made us, limited creatures that we are, and loves us in our struggle to celebrate and use the gifts he gives us and to overcome our imperfections and failures.

   There are no perfect people—not even among canonized saints! We all have limitations, flaws, and failings. We all make misjudgments and mistakes and “sin”.
   It doesn’t necessarily mean that we are profoundly flawed—only less than perfect.
   If our lives are to be thoroughly examined, measured, and adjudged, there will be, in retrospect, imperfections and regrettable moments—words, deeds, or actions.
   Since we’re limited, a critic can always find grounds for criticism. Generous school teachers to the contrary, we actually never really merit 100%—but, even so, there are huge differences, for instance, among grades of 95% (very, very good), 75% (not too bad), or 50% (seriously needing attention and improvement).
   This doesn’t mean that we should stop striving for perfection, only that we should do so realizing that it is absolutely totally unattainable.
   It also means, though, that we should stop wallowing in our inevitable failures or bewailing our imperfections. It’s okay to dream the impossible dream, but only if we don’t forget that it’s the impossible dream! (No 100%!)
   It’s also okay—and appropriate—to be realistic about our successes and failures, for we necessarily have both.
   If you’re inclined to be overly pessimistic about your life, remember that total perfection is impossible for you—but, also, with the help of God you can do, and probably have done, many good and wonderful things for many others.
   If you’re inclined to be overly optimistic, remember that only by God’s grace have you achieved all that you have achieved!




26 February 2023

Symbols

A symbol is something that represents or stands for something else. For example, the Star of David is a symbol of Judaism and the cross is a symbol of Christianity.
   Every culture has its own symbols and its own customs regarding how its symbols are to be respected and understood.
   If we salute our national flag and treat it with great care, respect, and reverence, it’s not for the flag itself but for the nation and its values that it represents.
   Symbols are important “ingredients” of the Jewish Passover seder, a ritual meal recalling the loving care of God for his people. Special foods are served that are symbolic reminders of events of Jewish history.
   Jesus’ last supper was a seder. According to Luke 22:14-20:
     When the hour came, he took his place at table with the apostles. He said to them, “I have eagerly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer, for, I tell you, I shall not eat it again until there is fulfillment in the kingdom of God.”
   Then he took a cup, gave thanks, and said, “Take this and share it among yourselves; for I tell you that from this time on I shall not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.” Then he took the bread, said the blessing, broke it, and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which will be given for you; do this in memory of me.” And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which will be shed for you.”
   Jesus introduced two new symbols at this last Passover meal with his disciples.
   At the beginning he broke the blessed bread and distributed it to the apostles saying, “This is my body, which will be given for you; do this in memory of me.”
   At the end with the final cup of wine he said, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which will be shed for you.”

   Writing to the Corinthians some years later, the apostle Paul said (1 Cor 11:23-26):
   For I received from the Lord what I also handed on to you, that the Lord Jesus, on the night he was handed over, took bread, and, after he had given thanks, broke it and said, “This is my body that is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord until he comes.
   As the centuries passed and as Christian customs developed and became traditional, these two symbols became the core of the Christian Passover ritual, better known as the Mass or the Eucharist.
   Over the centuries some great saints have reflected deeply about the nature of these symbols and what they symbolize.
   The important thing, of course, is not so much to study and celebrate the symbol itself but what it symbolizes—that’s why we give the care, respect, and reverence to the symbol that belong to what it represents.
   Eating together the broken bread and drinking together the wine is to reaffirm the new covenant and our shared allegiance to it and to proclaim and celebrate the salvific nature of Jesus’ death on the cross.
   The broken bread reminds us that the broken body of Jesus was a sacrificial offering for all of us. The wine reminds us that Jesus’ blood shed on the cross sealed the new covenant.
   Mass is a time for thankful remembrance and for renewing faithful commitments.


20 November 2022

You Think You’re Thinking?

Think is a general word meaning to exercise the mental facilities so as to form ideas, arrive at conclusions, etc. The dictionary gives a lot of meanings for the word. Here’s a few:
   1. to use the mind for arriving at conclusions, making decisions, drawing inferences, etc.; reflect; reason.  2. to weigh something mentally; reflect.  3. to call to mind; recall; remember.  4. to have an opinion, judgement, etc.  5. to determine, resolve, work out, etc. by reasoning.
   You know what happens sometimes? We think we’re thinking, but we’re really not thinking at all. Frequently we may simply be:
   Parroting – mechanically repeating the words or acts of others, frequently without full understanding, or:
   Quoting – reproducing or repeating a passage of or statement of another.
   You’d think that being well educated would mean being an effective and critically thinking person, but, alas, that’s not always the case.
   Beware of confusing liking with thinking. Just because we’re fond of something, or prefer something, or used to something, or belong to something isn’t the same as reflecting on, reasoning about, working out, and critically deciding about something.
   And, it’s not just about things; it’s also about others. For example, we may prefer the company of and trust someone who may not be so good for us, nor so good as we may imagine.
   When we were very young, we learned to accept, repeat, and obey what we were told by adults. But, as we matured and were educated, hopefully we learned to think critically about what we were told by or learned from others.
   Others includes, for example, family members, friends, neighbors, colleagues, even doctors, lawyers, officials, newscasters, preachers, teachers, and authors.

   When you read, hear, and/or view the daily news, think! When you listen to “experts”, think! When your doctor prescribes for you, think! When someone gives you financial advice, think! When you’re shopping, think. When, you’re betting, think! When you’re proposing, think! When you’re listening to a sermon in church, think! When you’re reading a book, even the Bible, think!
   No parroting or quoting. No “deference to authority”. No blind obedience. No unreflective decision making. No being swayed by desires, hopes, and fears. Mature adult people think!
   It doesn’t mean that you always get it right. You can think you’re thinking something through completely and adequately, but you may be wrong. The solution: rethink!
   There are some things that no amount of thinking can resolve or fully understand, but which still require making decisions and choices. That’s okay.
   There is a role for trusting the judgement and insight of another, especially an older, wiser, more experienced other. There are times where choices are required in situations where you can’t think it out alone.
   You know an important area where this is the case? Religion, especially belief, faith, and trust. It’s not inappropriate to act on faith and trust, if you have thought things out to the limits of your ability and experience—but it may be inappropriate if you first didn’t bother to think things out as best you could.
   God gave us eyes, ears, and a brain to think with and intervenes in our lives more than we fully realized or thought!
   Think about that!


16 October 2022

Saints and Sinners

Saint:  1. a person of exceptional holiness of life, virtue, or benevolence.  2. a person recognized as such by family, community, or Church. 

Sinner:  1. a person who transgresses the law of God.  2. a person who willfully or deliberately violates some religious or moral principle.  3. a person who is guilty of any reprehensible or regrettable action, behavior, lapse, etc.

   Neither word means that a person is 100% good or 100% bad; however both words imply that the person is exceptionally, outstandingly, unusually good or bad.
   Unfortunately we usually use a word that means one extreme or another as though they were absolutes. (For example, saying that a person is tall or short, skinny or fat, dark or light, pretty or ugly, dumb or smart, old or young, poor or rich, truthful or false, straight or gay—the list in endless.)
   Word pairs like these actually name a scale’s two extremes, and we’re all in some position on the scale except at either end.
   So, in a sense, we all have a bit of both. “Saints” can occasionally be guilty of reprehensible or regrettable actions and “sinners” can occasionally do exceptionally holy, virtuous, or benevolent things.
   The words, if used fairly, point to a sort of majority-of-the-time behavior—and this can fluctuate and change. We may start out or initially be treated as saints and end up being considered as sinners—and vice-versa!
   – Remember Joseph’s initial hesitation to marry Mary.
   – Remember what Jesus said to the “good” thief who was crucified at his side.
   – Remember Jesus himself being adjudged and punished as a notorious criminal.
   Also, our understanding of what it means to be a saint or sinner often changes and varies from place to place and time to time.

   For example, in the early centuries of Christianity, when many persons were sentenced to a painful death for not worshiping the official gods, martyrdom, a death like Jesus’, was esteemed.
   As time passed, martyrdom declined but extolling the heroism and death of Jesus and the martyrs led to esteeming a lifestyle of extreme denial and living sacrifice.
   Some popular early hermits, by contemporary standards seemed to be “wild men”, almost crazy, living in desert caves, barely clothed nor adequately fed.
   As this lifestyle also declined and there no longer were hermits living in desert caves, it influenced the development of early monasticism where denial and sacrifice were still important ideals and practices.
   These ideals lived on in the later, action-oriented religious orders with their many services to others. Practicing poverty, chastity, and obedience were still considered a necessary part of holiness.
   This also continued to some degree in the development of “secular” (i.e. not bound by religious community vows) clergy, especially with the requirement of clerical celibacy.
   In our contemporary world, that too, is being critically examined and its failures denounced.
   We’re all a mixture of saint and sinner. Our challenge is to try to move more towards the “saint” extreme of the scale than the other.
   We try to be more like Jesus as best we understand him and live a holy life as best we understand that.
   We’re not dreaming an impossible dream, aspiring to a holiness of life—but sometimes we need to realize that we’re not going about it the best way we could, and should!


3 July 2022

Reaching for the Realm of God

   Come, let us build ourselves a city
   and a tower with its top in the sky,
                      (Genesis 11:4)

No, this wasn’t what originally inspired the tall buildings of New York or other modern cities, even though their tall constructions are often called “skyscrapers”.
   Remember, the story of the Tower of Babel has a worldview that the earth is flat and that the highest heaven (sky) is the realm of God.
   The aspiration to be able to build high enough to reach the realm of God was the heighth of presumption—and, in the story, linguistic confusion, misunderstanding, and being dispersed over all the earth was the price to be paid for this presumption.
   Beware! Often the attempts to deepen our knowledge of matters of faith run the risk of a similar sort of presumption. We tend to think that our construction of sophisticated ideas that narrow slightly the parameters of the mystery we are trying to better understand actually may explain the unknown.
   It’s like the tale of the blind men and an elephant. They never had encountered an elephant before, but by touching it they attempted to describe it. But each touched only one part of the elephant. None of them could describe the whole creature.
   Theological concepts and constructions like matter, form, person, foreknowledge, substance, accident, body, soul may help us to understand and explain a part of what we believe—but which in its totality is beyond our abilities.
   All this doesn’t mean that theology is inappropriate or a waste of time. But be careful not to deceive yourself that by learning a little you’re building so high that you’ll will actually be able to attain the fullness of the knowledge of God.

   Scientific knowledge is very different from faith. Science is concerned with the tangible, the observable, the measurable, the provable aspects of the created world and universe and all that is in it.
   Faith doesn’t disparage science, but is more concerned with revelation, confidence, and trust.
   God speaks through all the beauty and wonder of his creation, but he also communicates through the revealed word, tempered by the understanding and limits of understanding of those who were inspired to speak and write it.
   Most of us, if we take a flight from one place to another have hardly any knowledge or training in flying a plane—but we trust in the training and skill of the pilots, even though the technical details escape us.
   There are multitudinous details to our religious lives that we can thoroughly understand since they are human customs, traditions, rules, and regulations.
   But the principal things we believe are beyond our complete understanding. In this, we’re like one of the blind men encountering the elephant. We understand something, some component or aspect—but understanding and explaining everything is beyond us.
   For example, the nature of God, the Trinity, the identity of Jesus, the resurrection, the functioning of the sacraments, creation and evolution, infallibility, the inspiration of the Bible, providence, destiny, death, life after death, to name just a few.
   Of course it’s legitimate to build bigger, better, and taller towers—but they’ll never reach the realm of God.


22 May 2022

Zeroing in on the Unknowable

In a way, this describes what, over the centuries, theologians often have been doing—and even scientists, too! But, remember, getting more and more insight and information doesn’t mean we fully understand what ultimately remains a mystery and unknowable.
   This is not a critique of faith. Believing and knowing are two different things. Knowledge is more a matter of exploring, learning, testing, and gaining understanding. On the other hand, belief is more a matter of confidence, trusting, and daring.
   You may be my friend and I love and trust you, but that doesn’t mean that I had thoroughly investigated everything you thought, said, and did over the whole course of your life to reach this conclusion.
   A classic example: the Bible. We often say that it is the revealed word of God. Does that mean, can that mean, that every single word of the Bible was said by, was communicated by God?
   The Bible is not one unified book, but a collection of various kinds of writings and reflections by many different people over a span of many centuries—and translated by a variety of different translators.
   You’re not meant to take every single sentence or statement in the Bible and trust that it is exactly what God said—but you can trust that what you read is somebody’s interpretation in good faith of what God inspired and how it is to be understood.
   Another example: the Sacraments. We often presume that if the right person says the right words in the right language and performs the right actions certain spiritual things necessarily will happen.
   But, that’s almost a definition of magic. These may be regulations for celebrating the particular sacrament, but the sacramental action remains mysterious and also requires prayer and acts of faith and trust in God and his revelations and his love.

   The Summa Theologica of Thomas Aquinas is an outstanding example of the successes and the limitations of an in-depth investigation into the nature of the mysteries of our faith.
   Using the intellectual concepts and tools of Aristotle, Thomas explored the meaning of the core expressions of our Christian beliefs, especially and notably the Eucharist.
   He increased our understanding of what is ultimately not completely knowable. With the distinctions of matter and form, substance and accident, and other Aristotelian concepts, Thomas profoundly advanced our understanding of our faith.
   But no matter how deeply he explored the mystery and how effectively he articulated his findings, he still did not have all the answers.
   His concept of transubstantiation is brilliant, but it’s not a complete answer or a solution, in spite of its well-honed and respected deep insights, to this mystery of the Eucharist.
   We know that Jesus broke and distributed bread and poured and shared wine at his last supper with his disciples, usually considered a Seder, a meal where the salvific acts of God were symbolically remembered.
   Was he adding to the traditional symbols of salvific acts of God to be ever remembered and celebrated by his followers? Or, even more, was he saying that the partakers were somehow mystically sharing his very life, body and blood?
   If you can’t quite fully understand, you’re in good company. Thomas didn’t either, although he did a great job of zeroing in on the unknowable. Ultimately it’s not a matter of knowledge, but of belief.


24 April 2022

Ransomed, Healed, Restored, Forgiven

Praise, my soul, the King of heaven;
To his feet your tribute bring;
Ransomed, healed, restored, forgiven,
Evermore his praises sing . . .
             (from Lauda Anima)

To be clear about the conditions referred to when we sing the hymn, we’re praising God because we’re totally and completely liberated, exonerated, and once again given a fresh start. We use powerful words:
   Ransomed:  1. redeemed from captivity, bondage, detention etc., by paying a demanded price.  2. delivered or redeemed from punishment for sin.
   Healed:  1. made healthy, whole, or sound; restored to health; free from ailment.  2. brought to an end or conclusion as conflicts between peoples or groups, usually with the strong implication of restoring former amity; settled; reconciled.  3. freed from evil; cleansed; purified.
   Restored:  1. brought back into existence, use, or the like; reestablished.  2. brought back to a former, original, or normal condition, as a building, statue, or painting.  3. brought back to a state of health, soundness, or vigor.  4. put back to a former place, or to a former position, rank, etc..  5. given back; made return or restitution of (anything taken away or lost).  6. reproduced or reconstructed (an ancient building, extinct animal, etc.) in the original state.
   Forgiven:  1. granted pardon for or remission of (an offense, debt, etc.); absolved.  2. gave up all claim on account of remittance of (a debt, obligation, etc.).  3. granted pardon to (a person).  4. ceased to feel resentment against:  5. canceled an indebtedness or liability of.
   If ransomed, healed, restored, forgiven, we’re in really good shape. All that pulls us back or pulls us down is gone and over with. There are no more claims upon us, no more unpleasant consequences to face.

   There is nothing to fear any more. The guilt and paralysis is gone. The slate is wiped clean. We have a fresh start.
   Truly, it is appropriate to sing songs of praise and gratitude—to move on with great expectations because of the mercy, pardon, and promise of the Lord.
   You know what? Much of the time we don’t do it! We don’t praise God, with free hearts and spirits, delighting in a new start. Perversely, we often have a fatal fascination with our weaknesses, failures, and losses.
   Why are so drawn to look into the mirror of our life—of our limited, flawed life with its history of missed opportunities and poor performances, of nursing of wounds to pride and ego, of lamentations of our many and constant failures, of damages done great and small, of withdrawals and self-defeats?
   Face it! We are all limited and weak creatures. Except for a special grace of God, our lives are imperfect, riddled with exaggerations, evasions, misrepresentations, failures, mistakes, and faults.
   God knows! He knows us, better than we do, and our responsibility for our frequent blindness, indifference, pretense, falsification, and selfishness.
   God forgives! Even so, we often find it hard, if not impossible, to forgive ourselves with our wounded pride.
   God made us to be what we are, human creatures. God is not blind to our failures, but God is merciful.
   What foolish pride it is that we never cease looking at ourselves and our weaknesses and rarely look at and sing the astoundingly generous and undeserved pardon, mercy, and love of God, who repeatedly ransoms, heals, restores, and forgives us.


26 December 2021

Taking Care of the Baby and the Bathwater

“Don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater” is good advice about a lot of things, not just about bathing babies.
   The point of the saying is that in caring for the baby we shouldn’t confuse the baby with the dirt that may have accumulated on him/her.
   When good Pope John XXIII announced his intention to convoke an ecumenical council he had used a somewhat similar metaphor, about cleaning a great painting so that its original beauty could better be seen, for assuring Christians worried about possible changes in the Church.
   In our modern world, polarized in many aspects, similar concerns, unease, and challenges are facing us.
   On the one hand, we don’t want to leave the baby dirtied or the great painting encrusted with accumulated grime and retouching—but on the other hand, we don’t want to endanger either the baby or the painting.
   The reality of life is that babies do get dirtied and need to be bathed—and great works of art sometime do require a delicate cleansing.
   Remember when Michelangelo’s frescoes in the Sistine Chapel were cleansed and restored? Some in the art world were shocked by the boldness of the original colors he had used, since they were so accustomed to seeing them through the pre-restoration accumulations of grime.
   When it comes to babies, the matter is more complicated. Babies are living beings; that means they grow, changing and developing. If we want to have them always as they once were, we are denying them life, since life involves change and development.
   Resistance to change may preserve something valued in the past, but also it may preclude growth and, perhaps, betterment and progress.

   The challenge is about discernment. Are we cleansing the accumulated disfigurement over time that needs to be washed away? Or, are we confusing accretions with essence, altering and changing something important and vital?
   For better or worse, our contemporary politics are never going to be exactly like the days of Washington, Lincoln, or Roosevelt, nor should they be. The world has changed.
   For better or worse, our contemporary social customs are never going to be exactly like those of a century ago or even those we may fondly remember from our youth.
   For better or worse, our religious beliefs, customs, and practices are never going to be exactly like they were before the early 20th century or the Second Vatican Council.
   If we’re tempted to work for restoration, allowing for development, we really need to remember the baby/bathwater dilemma. We cannot return entirely to the past.
   We have to let the living baby grow and mature, while washing away all that despoils its beauty and impedes its growth.
   Part of the challenge of our aging is experiencing change in our health, fitness, appearance, ideas, and values, as well as adjusting to the continual changes in the customs, practices, priorities, ideals, and values of the society in which we live.
   Do I always get it right? Do you? Of course not! It’s the very essence of a human being to be limited in every way—and also to be changing in every way.
   Call it what you will—mistake, error, misjudgment, fault, sin, or even progress—it’s who we are and what we do.
   God knows! (He made us this way!)


12 December 2021