Imperfect Societies

Imagination knows no bounds. We can imagine things that may never have been and may never be. If we strive to attain what we imagine, we may make progress but may also never attain our goal completely.
   In 1516 Thomas More wrought a book, Utopia, about an imaginary island where everything was almost perfect. But “utopian” now means a vision of things so idealistic that it is almost a dream and unrealistic.
   Don’t get me wrong. I don’t mean that aspiring to be or to make things better and better is not a good thing, but realistically perfection is never attainable.
   A very popular notion in ecclesiology before and even during much of the last century was that of the perfect society.
   The perfect society had basic institutions and structures to ensure the common good, protection of rights, and justice; it included legislative, administrative, and judicial institutions.
   A popular teaching in the once Christian part of the world was that there are only two perfect societies, the State and the Church.
   Why in the world was the Church identified as on a par with the State? Perhaps it had to do with the decline and fall of the Western Roman Empire which left the Church as a quasi-governmental force and institution in central Italy, the Papal States
   Perhaps it was the influence of books of the Bible that describe the history of the Jewish people as a nation of believers ruled and guided by God, often speaking through prophets and priests.
   The Church’s role became entangled with government’s. The Church had its own laws, rules, and regulations; mechanisms for teaching and enforcement; and penalties.
   Although early Christianity was tormented and rejected by the civil society, the Roman Empire, it gradually became the imperial state religion and the Church wielded great power in many countries.

   Is there still room for such a role of the Church? Should the Church have a system of laws and punishments as the State does? Should the clergy in varying degrees be a ruling class
   You know, it was only as recent as a little over 50 years ago, when Pope St. Paul VI, rejecting this, eliminated the papal coronation and the triple crown itself
   It may seem strange and hard to imagine for us now-a-days, but the classic conclusion to a formal letter to a pope used to close with, “humbly prostrate and kissing the sacred purple…”
   To what extent should the Church regulate the conditions for and validity of marriages? Clearly the Church may place preconditions before choosing to bless and recognize a marriage. But, the legal regulation of marriages in contemporary societies is seen as the role of the State
   The State can and does set conditions for recognizing the existence of a marriage and for ceasing to recognize it. But the heart of any marriage is the mutual consent of the parties, no matter the recognition or not by Church or State.
   Thanks be to God the days of Church trials and deadly punishments are long gone—think of Joan of Arc—but the tendency to judge and even publicly punish its members still lingers.
   As we study history, hopefully we learn from the mistakes of the past—which, considering the state of the past world and of human knowledge and experience in bygone days, were understandable.
   I’m glad I’m not as deaf, dumb, and blind as I once was. There may still be a chance for me after all!


4 July 2021

Where He Was Risen – The Holy Sepulchre

I wonder what the Crusader knights must have thought when in 1099, after a bloody battle to take Jerusalem, the Holy City, they finally saw the tomb of the Lord Jesus. At home they were used to seeing churches or their crypts with the grand tombs of royalty and higher clergy, elegant Sarcophaguses housing their last mortal remains, often topped by a life-sized stone effigy of the deceased. Of course, there was no coffin housing the remains of the Resurrected One nor need for a sculptured effigy. What, then, was there to see? Well, more or less what one sees today, a kind of shelf on which an enshrouded body could be laid or, more precisely, a marble slab over the remains of the rough-cut stone shelf of the original burial place.
What would that original place have looked like? It may well have been a kind of natural or artificial cave, somewhat modified, with shelf-like niches for the placement of the bodies, a little like the catacombs in Rome. But, remember, these Crusader knights were seeking and arriving at this holy place over a thousand years after the burial of the body of Jesus—and lot had happened during these thousand years.
It’s safe to assume that the early followers of Jesus would have known the execution area outside the city walls and the location of the nearby tomb where his body was placed after it was taken down from the cross. Maybe the tomb was venerated and visited, although hardly with the same sentiments with which we visit the grave of a loved one—for the tomb of Jesus was only briefly used and, as the angel messengers told the First of his followers to come there, “He’s not here. He’s risen.”
Whatever the case, in a relatively few years after the death of the Lord, the tomb area became inside, not outside, the city when the new northern wall of Jerusalem was built. However, following the siege of the city during the first Jewish-Roman War in the year 70, Jerusalem and its temple were razed to the ground. In 130, the Roman Emperor Hadrian vowed to rebuild the city, but he redesigned it along the classic model of a Roman colony town and called it Aelia Capitolina. Part of his plan was to obliterate all traces of sites venerated by the early Christians within his new city by building a pagan temple over them, with a statue of Jupiter over Calvary and an altar to Venus over the tomb of Jesus.
What a paradox! His plan to obliterate the holy sites and their veneration actually preserved and marked them. As a result of the visit of the first Christian Empress Helena, mother of Constantine the Great, to the Holy Land in 326-328, the pagan temple was removed, the sites of Calvary and the tomb were revealed, the remains of the true cross were found, and a great Church of the Resurrection was constructed by the emperor and inaugurated in 335.
As described by Franciscan Father Eugene Hoade in his classic Guide to the Holy Land, its atrium or entrance courtyard was accessed directly from the Cardo Maximus, the principal avenue of Aelia Capitolina. Directly across the atrium was the basilica-style church with five naves and an apse, dedicated to the mystery of the Resurrection. In a garden behind the basilica were two important sites to be venerated: to the left was a great stone block, the very site of the crucifixion, carved from the hill of Calvary, adorned with precious stones, and surmounted by a cross. Across the garden, opposite the apse end of the basilica was a great rotunda enclosing the tomb of Jesus. Again, the surrounding rock was removed leaving only the portion in which the tomb had been excavated standing and enshrined in the rotunda.
Our modern mentality is taken aback by this alteration of historical sites. We expect to see a famous place in its original setting, but this wasn’t the mentality of Constantine’s time; their way to display something precious was to cut, shape and mount it in a beautiful setting as, for example, we would cut, shape and mount a diamond to be part of a ring or necklace.
However, the beautiful works of Constantine lasted not quite three centuries. What happened was this: the continual political tensions between the Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Empire and the Sasanian Persian Empire had erupted into a full scale war in 602. Under Persian Emperor Khosrow II, his armies invaded and plundered Byzantine territories, and, since by then Christianity was the imperial state religion of the Romans, their churches were public buildings, targeted for destruction. In 614, this fate befell Jerusalem and Constantine’s church.
The Persian occupation was short-lived. After the withdrawal of their forces, the Church of the Resurrection was somewhat restored by Modestus, Patriarch of Jerusalem. However, the Byzantines soon again lost their control of the Holy Land, this time forever, when it fell into the hands of conquering Muslim armies. Happily the Church of the Resurrection was respected by Caliph Umar when he traveled to Jerusalem to receive the submission of the city in 637, for Islam venerates Jesus as the greatest of the prophets and messengers of God, except for the Prophet Muhammad. Unfortunately, centuries later, the Caliph Al-Hakim (996-1021) did not follow in Umar’s footsteps, and in 1009 he had the great church in Jerusalem again destroyed.
With the permission of Al-Hakim’s successor in 1042-1048 the Byzantine Emperor ConstantineIX reconstructed some of part of site, not rebuilding the great basilica but enshrining Calvary, the tomb, and the garden area into a more modest sized church. Intended or not, this gave greater emphasis to the passion and death of the Lord even though the new church was still known by local Christians as the Church of the Resurrection. This was what the Crusader knights found in 1099.
During the following 88 years of Crusader control of Jerusalem (1099-1187), the church, called by these invading Western Christians as the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, was somewhat further modified, especially with the creation of some crypt chapels under part of the area where the great Constantinian basilica-church once stood. As the following centuries passed, there was no further damage done to the shrine by political forces, but by natural forces, yes, especially by fires and earthquakes. Various major and minor repairs and restorations were made, but, even so, today’s visitors are still viewing the structure of Crusader days.
Under the rule of pagan Rome, Christian Rome, Muslim caliphates (except for the Crusader period), and, during the last century, Great Britain, Jordan, Palestine, and now Israel, the church in Jerusalem that is the focus of pilgrimage today is an enshrined place of the crucifixion, burial, and memory of the resurrection of Jesus, an architectural patchwork in the heart of the Old City. One legacy of Crusader days is the regrettable misnomer, calling the Church of the Resurrection the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. One doesn’t go there so much to view and pray at an empty sepulchre as to mediate on and celebrate with the eyes of faith Jesus’ triumph over sin and death opening the way that leads to the fullness of life.
God forbid that we should forget the ancient message for those looking for the body of Jesus at the empty tomb, “He’s not here. He’s risen!”

(Published in
The Maronite Voice, 16:2, April 2019)

Middle East Christians on the Move

Adapted from an address by Msgr. Robert L. Stern to the Consulta of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem, 3 December 2008

Demographics

Years ago, a bishop from the Middle East said to me, “Monsignor, you have to understand that in our part of the world numbers have a very symbolic value.” This was a polite way of saying that certain numbers are asserted that may or may not correspond to reality.
Accurate population statistics of Middle East countries are hard to come by; Israel, however, maintains current census data. Let me propose some reasonable estimates.
As of October 2008, some 7,337,000 people lived in Israel; 147,000 or two percent of them are Christian, for the most part Arabs. This ignores more than 300,000 people who have entered Israel according to the Law of Return and officially are classified as non-Jewish. Who are they? Generally, they come from a Marxist Eastern Europe with a family background that is most likely Orthodox Christian. In addition, many Christian guest workers, Filipinos and others, live and work in Israel.
Approximately 3,800,000 people live in Palestine, i.e., the West Bank and Gaza, the occupied territories with their limited degree of Palestinian autonomy. At most, Christians of all denominations total about 40,000 people or one percent of the population.
So, in the traditional Holy Land area, you have a total population of more than 11,000,000 people with less than 200,000 Christians — the smallest proportion of Christians of any country in the region.
Today, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan probably is home to almost 6,000,000 people. Four to six percent of the kingdom’s population — perhaps 250,000 people — are Christian.
Generally, nearly a third of these Holy Land Christians are Latin (Roman) Catholics, about a third are Melkite Greek Catholics, and Greek Orthodox Christians make up the balance. There are also some other Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant denominations.
About 3,900,000 people live in Lebanon; Christians number about 1,170,000 or thirty percent of the total population. This is a significant decline from when France created the country as a majority Christian enclave.
Syria has somewhat fewer than 20,000,000 people, and about 1,850,000 are Christian — 9.4 percent of the total population. Iraq has somewhat over 28,000,000 people; the most generous estimate would indicate that there are 760,000 Christians left, or 2.7 percent of the population. But, the real numbers are probably much smaller.
Egypt’s population of 81,700,000 people is rapidly growing. Generally, about ten percent of the population is considered Coptic Orthodox. Much smaller Coptic Catholic and evangelical churches exist; Latin Catholics are almost exclusively religious who work in church institutions.

Sociological trends

This demographic information is static. It is important to consider the situation dynamically — to examine the population trends.
Since the conclusion of World War I, which ended 400 years of Ottoman Turkish hegemony in the Middle East, Christian populations have been declining throughout the region. Look at the number of Christians living in Jerusalem a hundred years ago and today; look at Damascus, look at Iran. There is a tremendous reduction in the proportion of Christians and, for the most part, in their absolute number.
What are the reasons? First, Middle East Christians tend to be very well educated compared to the majority of the population. And, it seems that the higher the level of education and economic opportunity of the family, the smaller the family size. Accordingly, you find a steadily declining birthrate among the Christian population.
In economically less developed sectors or in the more religiously conservative sectors, larger families are the norm. For instance, ultra-Orthodox Jews in Israel and strictly observant Muslims throughout the region have a much higher birthrate.
Another reason for the declining numbers of Christians is emigration. Christians are leaving the Holy Land, the Arab world and the Middle East. Why? Most Christians feel a sense of exclusion from the predominantly Muslim or Jewish societies in which they live. Some observers allege the region’s Christians suffer persecution. This is an exaggeration, I think, but that there is discrimination against Christians in most Muslim countries is absolutely incontestable.
The degree of discrimination varies from country to country. Certainly, in a large country like Egypt, there have been distinguished Christian ministers such as Boutros Boutros-Ghali. But generally the higher levels of the political and social order are reserved for Muslims.
Further, the West has its attractions. Most Middle East Christians have family or friends living freely in Australia, Scandinavia, Latin and North America.
In summary, dispassionately and in terms of population trends, it is clear that the number of Christians is rapidly declining throughout the entire Middle East. Some sources project that it is likely the total Christian population of the Arab world will be as low as 6,000,000 within two decades.

Historical perspective

An historical perspective — a look at very long-term trends — is very useful for assessing the present.
Christianity began as a branch of Judaism in what we call the Holy Land. It was a Jewish sect and had that ethnic identity. The first Christians were Jews. Jesus, Mary, Joseph and the Apostles were all Jews, Messianic Jews. The world in which they lived was under the control of the pagan Roman Empire.
As Christianity began to spread, early Christians struggled with the question, “Are we to be Jewish or not?” The breaking point with Judaism came once pagans (Gentiles) were admitted into the Christian community without the obligation of converting to Judaism. Early Christianity quickly became, so to speak, a transnational movement. To be Christian did not demand to belong to a particular tribe, ethnic group or political body. This was a very radical departure from the norm, since religion was a component of the social and political order in all ancient societies. Christianity had the character of an organized movement without national or ethnic boundaries. In Christ, as St. Paul insisted, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free person, there is not male and female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”
Christianity rapidly spread within and outside the Roman Empire. But since these Christians did not always accept the religions of the lands in which they lived, they were often seen as subversive. In fact, in Rome they were killed for not being “politically correct” — they refused to offer sacrifices to the gods of the state. Christians generally refused to accommodate themselves to any state religion, whether of Rome, Persia or any other place.

Established religion of the Romans

Within a few hundred years, the fortunes of Christianity changed dramatically. By the end of the fourth century, Christianity became the official state religion of the Roman Empire. What impact did this establishment have upon perceptions of what was radically a transnational movement? Outside the Roman Empire, Christianity was seen as the religion of the Romans. In the rival empire of Persia, Christianity was seen not only as a foreign religion but the religion of the enemy. Even so, Christians and Christianity were tolerated.
Beyond the worlds of Rome and its enemies, Christianity flourished. Within a few hundred years, it spread across Asia; there were dioceses and bishops in Mongolia and China. The incredible growth of this branch of the church — what we today call the Assyrian Church of the East — was, and still is, relatively unknown to the Western world.
Yet in spite of this rapid growth of Christianity outside the Roman and Persian worlds, Christianity still was strongly perceived as the Roman religion.

Minority Christianity in an Islamic world

What happened with the coming of Islam? An important chapter of the history of the Middle East is the story of the Islamization of what were once Roman, Christian lands. For about three centuries, the populations of Egypt, Syria and the border lands of the Roman Empire were overwhelmingly Christian. However, Christianity gradually was reduced to the status of a minority religion as the Middle East increasingly became Muslim — a process still continuing today.
Islam tolerates Christians as a forerunner religion, but Christians have second-class status in Islamic society and frequently are subjected to tremendous social pressure to adopt Islam.

The Crusader interlude and its aftermath

For a relatively brief historical period, the Islamic states and jurisdictions of parts of the Middle East were displaced by Western feudal Christian rule. All of a sudden, the controlling political authority was Christian, in the sense that it stemmed from the “Christian” West. Christian Western powers imposed a new political order.
Also, the Crusader rulers displaced Eastern forms of Christianity and hierarchs with Western forms. For example, the Westerners installed their own patriarch in Jerusalem, which is why we still have a Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem today. The same thing happened in Antioch and Constantinople.
In the post-Crusader Islamic world, Christianity was viewed with now greater suspicion because of its entanglement with militant Western powers. Even centuries later, in the waning years of the Ottoman Empire, France claimed to be the protector of Catholics while Germany assumed a similar role for Protestants.
Western political powers have been almost universally perceived as religious powers by Muslims. For this reason, there has always been a lingering sense that Christians in the Middle East are of questionable loyalty because of their ties to France, Germany, Britain and the West in general.

The Western (“Christian”) mandates

Until the recent invasion of Iraq, there had been only one other brief interlude of Western, “Christian” control of the Middle East. After World War I, the Sykes-Picot Treaty divided control of that portion of the Ottoman Empire between Britain and France. During this period of the League of Nations mandates, the region’s modern nation states were created. France carved Lebanon from Syria. Britain severed Jordan from Palestine and joined three Ottoman provinces to create modern Iraq.
Only one of these modern nation-states created by the “Christian” powers during and after the mandate period, Lebanon, is nonsectarian. Israel is a Jewish state; all the rest are Muslim, either secular or religious.
Today, a Christian in the Middle East lives in a Judeo-Muslim world. Except for the unique and somewhat ambiguous case of Lebanon, Christians are citizens or subjects of either an Islamic or a Jewish political authority.

The future of Middle East Christianity

What does the future hold for Christians in the Middle East?
The nature of Christianity is for it not to be tied to any one government, ethnic group, or culture. Christianity transcends national, ethnic. and cultural boundaries. Christianity is for the world. Jesus came to save the whole world. The Holy Spirit was poured out on the whole world. The mission of the church is for the whole world — that is why it is called catholic, or universal. Human nature being what it is, the church may be at times entangled with a particular culture, ethnicity, or politics, but it serves the whole world.
The challenge for Christians everywhere, especially in the Middle East, is to not cling to a Western identity. In Lebanon, a generation or so ago, the average well-educated Christian spoke French, but could hardly speak Arabic. Effectively, Christians self-proclaimed themselves foreigners; now all that has changed. But many Christians in the Middle East still continue to identify with Western ways and Western styles of life.
Christians in the Middle East should not overly identify with a particular ethnicity either. Tribal identity remains strong in their countries. For example, many a Jordanian priest, if asked, “What tribe do you belong to?” would have a ready answer. He knows he belongs to a tribe; he has Bedouin roots.
Of course, we all belong to a family, a clan, and an ethnic group. In the United States, for example, when I went to school, other children would ask me, “What are you?” which meant, in my part of the world, “Are you Irish? Italian? German?” I could never give a simple answer; I always had to explain that though my family name is German Jewish, I am Catholic and of Irish descent on my mother’s side. We all have ethnic identity or identities. But Christianity is more than ethnicity. Christians in the Middle East — and everywhere — should not define themselves by it.
Sometimes Christians in the Middle East assert Western culture against Islamic culture. Muslims do not eat pork, we will. Muslims do not drink wine, we will. Muslims fast through Ramadan, we will not. The Christians seem to say we have to be us and they have to be them. While understandable, this attitude is another of the challenges for Christians. Christianity does not have to be — and should not be — tied to Western customs and lifestyles. Middle Eastern Christians are challenged to incarnate their faith in a culture that has been molded by Islam.

Christianity is not tied to geography

Another observation, which may generate some serious disagreement, is that Christianity has no necessary ties to geography. Judaism is land-bound. Judaism is focused on one piece of land, a small strip of land, the Holy Land, because of God’s promise to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and because of the ancient kingdoms of Judah and Israel. Because Judaism is land-bound, the creation of a Jewish homeland in the Middle East was and remains important to Jews.
Islam, too, is very tied to geography — to Mecca, Medina, and Jerusalem. In a sense, Muslims are shrine-bound. Jerusalem’s Haram as Sharif with its Dome of the Rock and Al Aqsa Mosque are extremely important to Islam. Ariel Sharon provoked the second intifada when he entered this Muslim sanctuary area atop the mount, where centuries ago the Jewish temple stood, to declare that an Israeli can stand anywhere in Israel. This was as dangerous as throwing a lighted match into a powder magazine.
For Muslims, Jerusalem is the third most important place in the world. Muslims are shrine-bound. Christians are not. Jesus is not buried in the Holy Sepulchre; it remains an empty tomb.
Remember the words of Jesus to the Samaritan woman, “… the hour is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem … but in spirit and in truth.”
Where do we find Jesus? We find him everywhere. We find him among ourselves when two or three of us are gathered in his name. As followers of Jesus, we do not have the ties to a place that Jews and Muslims do. Christianity can flourish anywhere. It can flourish in China, in Georgia, in Africa and in Rome.
Particular Christian structures and institutions, however, do not flourish in quite the same way. It is hard to do things the Italian way if you live in Australia or the Palestinian way if you live in Honduras. Structures have to be adapted to the places where they are located, but Christianity itself can be implanted and grow anywhere at all.
Even though there are no geographic imperatives in Christianity, Christians have historical roots in the Holy Land. There is no place so evocative to visit for a Christian as the land of the Bible. This is a land of immense symbolic importance to Christians. But, if it should happen that not a single Christian remains in the Holy Land, it will not fundamentally hurt Christianity.

A bridge to the future for the Arab world

Notwithstanding their limitations, Middle East Christians can be a bridge to the future for the Muslim Arab world. Christians have learned certain universal values from the modern, Western world and so can bring certain perspectives to the Arab world that are vitally important for its development and maturation.
For example, what in the United States is referred to as the “separation of church and state” is a very valuable concept. Vatican II enshrined the essence of this idea in its teaching about religious liberty and freedom of conscience. The United Nations also enshrines it in its declarations. It is deeply rooted in the teachings of Jesus. It is the idea that human dignity and freedom require respect for the conscience of the individual, which in turn requires freedom of worship. This concept can be very upsetting to the Islamic world. Yet, if the Islamic world is to join fully the community of modern societies, it has to integrate this and similar values into daily life.
Religious, cultural, and social pluralism is not an evil. Pluralism is a healthy phenomenon. It has been long experienced in North America and is increasingly being experienced in many other Western countries. It is a value in itself. Christians, because they serve as a bridge to these cultures, can be instruments in assisting the growth and evolution of the Islamic and Arab worlds.
Christians can offer the Islamic world some other unique perspectives. When the president of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue recently was asked about the difference between Muslim and Christian attitudes toward God, he summarized a lot by very briefly responding that Christians see God as Father — a tremendous insight.
Christians bring the values, for example, of reconciliation and forgiveness. We may take them for granted, but in the culture of much of the Mediterranean world, you are considered weak and soft if you are too open and forgiving; traditionally, honor demands vengeance. We may think of this as a sort of Mafia code, but it is alive and well. Even in some fairly modern Middle Eastern countries, the honor of your family, clan and tribe sometimes requires vengeance.
Christians come with a message of reconciliation and forgiveness that is countercultural. Jesus taught his followers to renounce their legitimate right to vengeance. This typically Christian value is totally different from the traditional culture of much of the Middle East. Yet it is a precious contribution Christians may bring to it.
Ultimately what Christians bring to the Middle East is that they become bridges in their very selves. In Rome, the Holy Father uses the title of “Pontifex Maximus,” originally a pagan Roman title. “Ponti” refers to “bridge” and “fex,” “to make”; a pontifex is a bridge builder. In ancient times, the building of a bridge represented a tremendous advancement. Bridges allowed people to cross rivers easily, facilitated transportation and opened the way for armies.
As Christians, we are all called to be “pontifical.” Our challenge is to bridge misunderstandings and differences. Christians have a tremendous role to play in the Holy Land and throughout the Middle East, even though they are a tiny minority and may not quite fit in.
In light of the current sociological reality, what Middle East Christians need is a John-the-Baptist-type of spirituality. The church is not going to flourish in the near future in the Middle East; it is in a state of rapid decline. But, this is okay. “He must increase, I must decrease.”
It would be an invaluable contribution if the church, if Christians can become an effective instrument to turn around the Islamic and Jewish worlds in which they live. In small ways, this is already happening. For example, Christian schools serve all the people of the region. At Bethlehem University, the majority of the students are not Catholic or Christian, yet they are receiving solid values, learning about the other, experiencing coexistence and receiving a high-quality education.

Migration of Christians

Though maintaining the Christian presence in the Middle East is important, the fact is that many Middle East Christians are emigrating.
When we talk about migration, we need to recall that Christianity is fundamentally a movement. Christians from the beginning have always spread throughout the world, conscious of their mission of evangelization, of spreading the good news of the teachings of Jesus and the kingdom of God.
The movement — the migration — of Christians is not necessarily bad. The fact that many Christians leave one place and go to another is not an evil, though they may move with regret. If there are more Christian Bethlehemites in Santiago, Chile, than in Bethlehem, then so be it; it is a fact of life. Is the goal to get every Christian Bethlehemite from Santiago back to Bethlehem to create a Christian majority there? Whether or not it is the goal, it is not going to happen; this also is a fact of life.
On the other hand, is it not wonderful that Christians from Bethlehem are bringing their values and history with them to other lands? Clearly, the migration of Middle East Christians, though not necessarily a negative phenomenon, does involve the weakening and perhaps ultimately the loss of a rich patrimony and culture in their homelands.
It is understandable that Christians and other people in the Middle East want to seek better lives elsewhere. It takes a valiant minority to stay simply for the sake of maintaining the Christian presence when other parts of the world beckon with jobs, educational opportunities, freedom, and a brighter future.

Cultivating a climate of safe migration

Bear in mind that migration does not mean that individuals cannot return. One of our challenges is to create a climate for safe migration. We worry about whether storks can travel from Russia, through the Middle East flyway, to Africa and back again. We are concerned that Monarch butterflies can get from North to Central America and back again. We want to ensure that whales can migrate freely through the seas.
Why are we not at least as concerned about the migration of people? That is to say, together with environmentalists, we want animals to live in a safe place, pass freely en route to their destinations, and have a safe breeding ground when they arrive. Do not migrating people deserve at least as much?
Minimally, as responsible Christians we must become migration advocates with the United Nations and with our own governments — advocates of safeguards that allow people to remain in their own homelands if they wish and of laws that both facilitate their moving about the world and also allow them, if you will, new breeding grounds in other places.
    It is ironic that we are more inclined to help birds migrate than people. And in migrations, as we know from birds, bees, salmon, and elephants, migrants return. Why cannot Christians return to the Middle East if the cultural and social climate attracts them? Why should they be excluded from returning, as is often the case?

Particular concerns for the Middle East

What then should be our principal concerns about the situation and migration of Christians in the Holy Land and the rest of the Middle East?
First, we must assist those who live there. They are our brothers and sisters. They live in a negative environment; often discriminated against, they lack many opportunities we take for granted. They need our help.
Second, if we are truly concerned with this part of the world, we must use some of our influence on governments of the lands in which we live to change their national policies concerning the Middle East.
The preamble of Pope Paul VI’s revised constitution of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre states that one of the three characteristic virtues of its members is “a courageous struggle for justice and peace.”
Not only for members of the order but also for all Christians, issues of justice, peace, human rights, and reconciliation, especially in the Holy Land and the Middle East, are of vital importance. Through advocacy in our home countries and our participation in the work of the local church, we help ensure that Christian values, Christian ethics, and Christian criteria of judgment are being brought to the negotiating table.
A very practical contribution we can make is to help those who choose to migrate — facilitate their arrival, welcome them and assist their settlement. We can also advocate less restrictive immigration policies in the countries where we live.
Lastly, do not forget those who stay. We are concerned for their survival. They need our financial help, presence and visits, promotion of education and human development, and our willingness at home to engage in the “courageous struggle for justice and peace.”


(Published in
one, 35:1, January 2009)

CNEWA History

I. EARLY HISTORY

During the years immediately following World War I, the Holy Fathers, Pope Benedict XV and Pope Pius XI, made it their mission to do all that they could to bring material and spiritual assistance to the countries and peoples sorely tried by years of war.((“Tutto il mondo sa con quale tenera sollecitudine il S. Padre Pio XI gloriosamente regnante, si prodigo nel soccorrere le diverse nazioni e popolazioni, cosi duramente provate dopo la guerra mondiale, cercando di arrecare aiuto e sollievo ad ogni loro necessita materiale e spirituale;…” (Luigi Cardinal Sincero, Pro-Secretary, Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church, letter to Pietro Cardinal Gasparri, Secretary of State of His Holiness, 10 March 1926) )) They were supported in this great work of charity by the generosity of the faithful of the whole world and in particular by the Catholics of the United States of America. The Holy See’s appeals for aid, especially in the years 1921-1923 for the relief of famine victims in Russia, were wholeheartedly and generously responded to by the American people, and various American associations were organized to assist the needy in Russia and other regions of the Near East.((“Nell’esplicazione di questa carita l’opera zelante del S. Padre fu spontaneamente e continuamente sostenuta dalla generosita dei fedeli di tutto il mondo e in particolar modo dai Cattolici degli Stati Uniti di America, sino a meritarse la reconoscenza speciale e l’encomio solenne del Sommo Pontifice.
“Ma il popolo americano non si e accontentato de rispondere corde magno et animo volenti all’ appello a lui fatto per soccorrere la Russia negli anni 1921 = 1923, quando quella nobile e cristiana popolazione cadde sotto il tremendo flagello della fame; che anzi parecchi organismi in America continuano in una maniera permanente a provvedere rilevanti soccorsi per la Russia e per le altre regioni del vicino Oriente, dove pur troppo ne permane il bisogno.” (Ibid.) ))

Establishment

On 11 March 1926, Pope Pius XI decided to unite permanently into one organization and under one administration all the American Catholic associations working for assistance to Russia and other areas of the Near East and in general working for the same goals as the Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church and the Pontifical Commission for Russia.((“La SANTITA’ di NOSTRO SIGNORE mi incarica di informare l’Eminenza Vostra Revma che il progetto per l’unificazione e l’amministrazione futura delle Associazioni, ora operose negli Stati Uniti d’America, per il vicino Oriente e la Russia e pienamente approvato, come fu presentato da Vostra Eminenza con lettera del 10 Marzo corrente.” (Pietro Cardinal Gasparri, Secretary of State of His Holiness, letter to Luigi Cardinal Sincero, Pro-Secretary of the Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church, 11 March 1926)
“1. D’ora in poi tutte le organizzazioni che esplicano negli Stati Uniti di America la loro attivita in aiuto ai Russi ed alle regioni del vicino Oriente, ossia in generale per tutte le finalita proprie della S. C. Pro Ecclesia Orientali e della Commissione Pro Russia debbono unirsi e rimanere unite in una sola organizzazione, sotto una unica direzione.” (Sincero, op. cit.) )) This new pontifical((“These sufferings, moreover, and the petitions for help, because of their very nature and the condition of the countries where they exist, still continue and will doubtless long continue. God alone can tell the time when, happily, Our assistance will no longer be needed. For these reasons, it was judged proper, not to say necessary, to constitute the CATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOCIATION on a permanent basis. It is, therefore, a supreme consolation to Us to know that the work has been so founded and We impart a special benediction for its perseverance. Having thus taken stable and permanent form it well merits to be called Pontifical both for the benefits it has bestowed in the past and the promise it holds for the future.” (Pope Pius XI, letter to Fr. Edmund A. Walsh, S.J., President of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, 30 July 1927)
“It was on their [Our beloved children of the venerable Christian Churches of the East] behalf, to fulfill an important need, that the Pontifical Mission Aid Society – the Catholic Near East Welfare Association – was erected in the year 1926,…” (Pope Pius XII, autographed letter to Our Beloved Son, Francis Cardinal Spellman, President of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, 24 October 1951) )) organization was to be called the “Catholic Near East Welfare Association”((“2. In particolare le due organizzazione, che fino ad ora hanno lavorato in quel campo, cioe la “Catholic Near  East Welfare Association” e la “Catholica Unio” debbono unirsi e fondersi in una sola associazione. Il titolo di questa sera: “Catholic Near East Welfare Association”, quale titolo adatto e sufficiente per esprimere lo intento generale di tutte quelle sopradette organizzazioni, rimanendo pero ben inteso e dichiarato per sempre che esso comprende anche la “Catholic Unio” e le finalita che questa finora se era proposte.” (Sincero, op. cit.) )) (CNEWA). It was placed under the immediate direction of the Archbishop of New York,((“4. E’ necessario che la suddetta Associazione “Catholic Near East Welfare Association” sia messa sotto l’immediata direzione di un Vescovo. Attesi i precedenti e l’interessamento benevolo gia personalmente prestato dall’ Emmo Sig. Card. Hayes, questa S. C. con la Commissione Pro Russia trova quanto mai opportuno che l’Arcivescovo di New York sia la persona designata a tale scopo e quindi desiderabile che l’ Emmo Card. Hayes sia inteso e dalla S. Sede pregato a darvi il suo consenso.” (Ibid.) )) and he was invited to form a governing body selected from the American hierarchy.((“5. Sara opportuno che l’Emmo Card. Hayes si compiaccia poi di pregare tutti gli Emmi Sig. Cardinali degli Stati Uniti, qualche Arcivescovo e Vescovo, perche vogliano formare con lui stesso un Comitato direttivo e che tutti gli Illmi e Revmi Membri della Gerarchia Americana, le Universita e gli Istituti Educativi Cattolici, il clero e il popolo sia invitato a prestare la sua desideratissima cooperazione: tuttavia per l’organizzazione e per il funzionamento concreto della “Catholic Near East Welfare Association”, per la costituzione in essa di particolari sezioni e per lo studio dei mezzi piu opportuni per raggiungere il suo compito, come la S. Sede ha sempre avuto la piu grande fiducia nella Gerarchia Americana, cosi e giusto che sia lasciato ad essa liberta de pratiche proposte e sistemazione. (Ibid.) )) The funds raised by the new association were to be placed directly at the disposition of the Holy Father, who would disburse them in response to the requests for assistance coming to him from all over the world or recommended to him by CNEWA itself.((“3. I soccorsi raccolti saranno messi direttamente a disposizione del S. Padre, il quale, conoscendo bene le finalita generali sopradette e in particolare quelle delle due organizzazioni ora unite e fuse in una sola associazione ed essendo meglio che ogni altro in grado di conoscere e valutare tutti i bisogni materiali e spirituali, morali e intellettuali, che da tutte le parti invocano da lui soccorso, oppure possono dalla stessa Associazione o anche da altri essere a Lui indicati, e per cio stesso nella condizione migliore per destinare piu utilmente e con maggior beneficio i mezzi posti a Sua disposizione.” (Ibid.) ))
Two groups especially recognized by the pope((“Fra questi caritatevoli organismi, diretti da Cattolici, il S. Padre ha con particolare compiacenza richiamato l’attenzione di questa Sacra Congregazione Pro Ecclesia Orientali sopra la “Catholic Near East Welfare Association”, amministrata da Mons. Riccardo Barry-Doyle e la “Catholica Unio” diretta dal revmo Dom Agostino Von Galen, O.S.B., due opere che hanno per diverse vie contribuito e possono ancora contribuire alla stessa causa comune, continuando a benemeritare di essa.” (Ibid.) )) were joined together in this new association.((“2. In particolare le due organizzazione, che fino ad ora hanno lavorato in quel campo, cioe la “Catholic Near  East Welfare Association” e la “Catholica Unio” debbono unirsi e fondersi in una sola associazione.” (Ibid.) )) One, the new association’s prototype, “The Catholic Near East Welfare Association,” legally incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on 30 September 1924,((“II. The purposes for which the said Corporation is to be formed are as follows: Without profit to the Corporation or its members to solicit and procure the voluntary contribution of funds for the relief of suffering people, particularly children, regardless of religious belief, in Greece, Turkey, Armenia and other countries known as the Near East; to use and apply such funds for the care of neglected and orphaned children and to otherwise alleviate distress among people of these countries by transferring funds so procured to individual societies, hospitals, orphan asylums or other institutions in said countries, organized for said purposes or in such other manner as the Corporation may deem advisable for the relief of such distress; and in connection with the foregoing objects to establish and maintain such organizations and institutions and to utilize and employ such agencies as the Corporation may deem proper.” (Charter of The Catholic Near East Welfare Association) )) had been inspired by several concerns: the expansion of Protestant missionary efforts in the Near East, incorporated by the United States Congress in 1919 as “Near East Relief”; the reunion movements nurtured by Father Paul Watson, founder of the Society of the Atonement, and Bishop George Calavassy, the second Apostolic Exarch for Byzantine-rite Greek Catholics in Thrace, Macedonia, and parts of Asia Minor; the pastoral support of the exarchate; the pressing needs of refugees flooding Constantinople after World War I, and, a few year later, the famine in Russia; and the care of more than a million Greeks refugees from Turkey in Greece itself.
The other, the “Catholic Union,” legally incorporated in the State of New York on 5 January 1925, was a branch of the “Catholica Unio,” organized to work for the reunion of the Ukrainian,Romanian, Bulgarian, and, later, all the Orthodox churches with Rome. Subtitled “A Society for the Propagation of the Faith in the Near East,” the Catholic Union’s ambition was to become a worldwide organization for the support of the Oriental Congregation in much the same way as the Society for the Propagation of the Faith supported the works of the Congregation for the Propaganda Fide. Part of its mission was “to establish and to maintain the Roman Catholicmissions in Eastern Europe” and “to create and sustain a friendly interest in the religious and moral life of the peoples of Eastern Europe.” Soon afterwards it was entitled “A Society for the Reunion with the Holy Church of the Separated Brethren of the Near East Incorporated.”
These two similar yet diverse entities each had its own ecclesiastical and lay advocates and supporters — “The Catholic Near East Welfare Association” advocating the cause of the Greeks and the “Catholic Union” increasingly concerned with the plight of the Russians. However, both variously described themselves as concerned for humanitarian assistance, missionary activity, and the promotion of church unity.
By the mandate of the Holy See, the purposes of both these organizations were to be included in the new association.((“2. In particolare le due organizzazione, che fino ad ora hanno lavorato in quel campo, cioe la “Catholic Near  East Welfare Association” e la “Catholica Unio” debbono unirsi e fondersi in una sola associazione.  Il titolo di questa sera: “Catholic Near East Welfare Association”, quale titolo adatto e sufficiente per esprimere lo intento generale di tutte quelle sopradette organizzazioni, rimanendo pero ben inteso e dichiarato per sempre che esso comprende anche la “Catholic Unio” e le finalita che questa finora se era proposte.” (Sincero, op. cit.) ))
Pius XI commended the new association and his dispositions for it to the hierarchy of the United States.((Il SANTO PADRE affida al Revmo P. Walsh, S.J., precedentemente Direttore dell’Opera Pontificia di soccorso per i bambini affamati in Russia, la missione di eseguire quel progetto, che SUA SANTITA’ raccomanda calorosasmente agli Illmi e Revmo Membri della Gerarchia negli Stati Uniti.” (Gasparri, op. cit.) )) On 15 September 1926, in keeping with the wishes of the Holy Father and on the initiative of the Archbishop of New York, the bishops of the United States at their annual meeting expressed their full approval and adoption of the pope’s plan and declared that CNEWA would be their sole instrumentality authorized to solicit funds for Catholic interests in Russia and the Near East.((“The Hierarchy of the United States in conference assembled express their full approval and adoption of the program of the Holy See providing for the unification of all societies now working in the United States of America for Russia and the Near East.  The resultant organization, the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, Inc., shall be the sole instrumentality authorized to solicit funds for Catholic interests in those regions and shall be so recommended to the entire Catholic population of the United States simultaneously in all dioceses, on a given Sunday, the date to be arranged in consultation with the respective Ordinaries.” (Minutes of the eighth annual meeting of the American bishops, 15 September 1926) ))

Initial organization and operations

CNEWA began to grow very much in accordance with the experiences and vision of its first president, Father Edmund A. Walsh, S.J. Father Walsh, who had previously headed a special “Papal Relief Mission to Russia,” identified CNEWA as “A Society in Aid of Catholic Interests in Russia and the Near East” and saw it primarily as a papal relief agency.
Following the ratification by the U.S. bishops of the Holy See’s wishes, the Board of Directors of CNEWA agreed to continue to use the original civil charter and to organize its activities into six departments: Greece and the Balkans, General Relief in Russia and Asia Minor, Religious Welfare (to assume the work of the Catholic Union), Education and Student Exchange, Domestic Interests Affecting the Oriental Church in America, and Business Administration.((Cf. Minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, 15 September 1926))
In accordance with the bishops’ resolution, on 23 January 1927, a collection was taken up with great success in all the churches of the United States for the support of CNEWA and its works.  When Pope Pius XI was informed of the result of the special collection, he was very pleased.  He designated some of the monies collected for the support of the Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church; the Pontifical Commission for Russia; the Greek Catholic exarchate in Athens; schools and orphanages in Palestine; refugees, schools and orphanages in Syria; Danzig’s Russian refugee orphanage; the school for Russian refugees in Namur; the works of the Holy See in Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, Berlin and Paris; the Oriental Institute in Rome; and the Russian Seminary in Rome. The rest remained in the United States at the disposition of His Holiness.((Cf. Rev. Edmund A. Walsh, S.J., “Annual Report of the President of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association to the Board of Directors, 1926-27,” 13 September 1927, Appendix No. 3))
Subsequently, by the mandate or with the approval of the pope, CNEWA made grants of assistance for a wide variety of charitable works such as the relief of flood victims in Louisiana, the evacuation of Russian refugees from Constantinople, and medical and relief assistance for earthquake victims in Puerto Rico.((Cf. Minutes of Meeting of Executive Committee of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, Inc., 11 October 1928))
Father Walsh insisted that “the wish of the Holy Father is rather to form a permanent society somewhat like the International Red Cross or the American Near East Relief.  It will be a centralized Catholic distributing agency which can materially assist the Holy See to meet the daily increasing demands made on the Holy Father for assistance in humanitarian works, in the field of education, and in social welfare work all over the world, as well as in distinctly religious and missionary activities.”((Rev. Edmund A. Walsh, S.J., letter to Rev. Stephen Donahue, secretary of the Archbishop of New York, 28 September 1926))
On 30 July 1927, Pius XI wrote to Fr. Walsh to express his gratitude to American Catholics for their generosity and his satisfaction that CNEWA was now constituted on a permanent basis as a pontifical organization.((Cf. Pius XI, op. cit.)) The next year, on 23 October 1928, the pope sent an autographed letter to the bishops of the United States praising the work of both the Society for the Propagation of the Faith and of CNEWA, expressing his appreciation for the funds raised and transmitted to him by both of the organizations, and distinguishing their respective roles.((“…two works of religion which are the object of intense, daily, and We were about to say, harrowing concern of Our Apostolic ministry….The first of these works of religion, the Society for the Propagation of the Faith is, as you also, Venerable Brothers, continually set forth in word and deed, truly the work of works, first and supreme in its importance because it is the continuing through the centuries and in the whole wide world of the work of the Divine Founder of the Church Himself and of His First Apostles; the second looks toward the East, so dear to us and so worthy of our veneration, whence first shone out on the world the light of Christianity, that East which once was a most flourishing garden of the Catholic Church and which later, separated, or rather torn, from the Catholic Church, fell into so wretched a plight, spiritual and material as well, that East which now as never before fills Us with hopes so strong and so sweet of seeing her return to the One Fold, but which for this very reason is more than ever beset and tempted by propaganda (only too well equipped with worldly resources of every kind) hostile to Christ and His Church.” (Pope Pius XI, autographed letter to the Cardinals, Archbishops, and Bishops of the United States, 23 October 1928) ))

Reorganization and clarification of mission

Father Walsh’s vision for CNEWA, however, was not universally accepted. By 1929 there was a strong reaffirmation on the part of the Holy See that the new organization was to respond to the spiritual and material needs of the East. It also made it clear that its mission was to be clearly distinguished from that of the Society for the Propagation of the Faith.
Better to clarify the competencies of the two societies and to establish a closer relationship between activities in favor of the home and foreign missions and those in favor of the spiritual needs of the missions and apostolate of the Near East and Russia, on 28 June 1930, Pope Pius XI established new regulations for these activities and for these two American organizations promoting them.((“…two works of religion which are the object of intense, daily, and We were about to say, harrowing concern of Our Apostolic ministry….The first of these works of religion, the Society for the Propagation of the Faith is, as you also, Venerable Brothers, continually set forth in word and deed, truly the work of works, first and supreme in its importance because it is the continuing through the centuries and in the whole wide world of the work of the Divine Founder of the Church Himself and of His First Apostles; the second looks toward the East, so dear to us and so worthy of our veneration, whence first shone out on the world the light of Christianity, that East which once was a most flourishing garden of the Catholic Church and which later, separated, or rather torn, from the Catholic Church, fell into so wretched a plight, spiritual and material as well, that East which now as never before fills Us with hopes so strong and so sweet of seeing her return to the One Fold, but which for this very reason is more than ever beset and tempted by propaganda (only too well equipped with worldly resources of every kind) hostile to Christ and His Church.” (Pope Pius XI, autographed letter to the Cardinals, Archbishops, and Bishops of the United States, 23 October 1928) )) He entrusted their implementation to the Cardinal Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith and the Cardinal Secretary of the Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church, in conjunction with the American hierarchy.((Ibid.))
The Holy Father reaffirmed the original statute of CNEWA of 10 March 1926,((“6.) La C.N.E.W.A. rimane quale associazione permanente per gli scopi e le necessita spirituali delle Chiese, Missioni, Istituti e persone dipendenti dalla S.C. per la Chiesa Orientale e dalla Pontificia Commissione per la Russia; dovra pero organizzarsi ed esercitare la sua attivita strettamente a norma del suo Statuto originario, fissato nella lettera del 10 Marzo 1926 dell’E.mo Card. Sincero all’E.mo Cardinale Pietro Gasparri: quindi senza colletta alcuna a se propria, e non solo sotto il benevolo interessamento dell’E.mo Cardinale Hayes, Arcivescovo di New York, ma ancora sotto la sua immediata e personale direzione, colle norme esposte al N. 5 della precitata lettera, salvo le modifiche espresse nella presente.” (Ibid.) )) emphasizing that it was to conduct its activities under the immediate and personal direction of the Archbishop of New York.(( “6.) La C.N.E.W.A. rimane quale associazione permanente per gli scopi e le necessita spirituali delle Chiese, Missioni, Istituti e persone dipendenti dalla S.C. per la Chiesa Orientale e dalla Pontificia Commissione per la Russia; dovra pero organizzarsi ed esercitare la sua attivita strettamente a norma del suo Statuto originario, fissato nella lettera del 10 Marzo 1926 dell’E.mo Card. Sincero all’E.mo Cardinale Pietro Gasparri: quindi senza colletta alcuna a se propria, e non solo sotto il benevolo interessamento dell’E.mo Cardinale Hayes, Arcivescovo di New York, ma ancora sotto la sua immediata e personale direzione, colle norme esposte al N. 5 della precitata lettera, salvo le modifiche espresse nella presente.” (Ibid.) )) The archbishop was instructed to select a secular priest as the executive director of CNEWA with the title of Secretary,((“7.) L’E.mo Signor Cardinale Hayes, sentito Monsignor Delegato Apostolico, nominera, scegliendolo dal clero secolare, un Direttore degli offici della C.N.E.W.A., con incombenze di Segretario; e nulla osta che egli possa essere lo stesso Direttore Generale della Propagazione della Fede.” (Ibid.) )) and the pope made some detailed provisions for the Mission Sunday collection((“2.) La colletta stabilita in una domenica dell’anno = e detta percio “Mission Sunday” = allo scopo di dare campo a tutti, anche a quelli che non sono membri dell’associazione della Propagazione della Fede, di contribuire al mantenimento delle Missioni, dovra intendersi destinata, come infatti il Santo Padre destina, a provvedere non soltanto alle Home=missions e alle missioni e necessita della Propagazione della Fede fra gli infedeli, ma anche alle missioni e bisogni spirituali del Vicino Oriente e della Russia.” (Ibid.). Cf. also sections 1, 3, 4, and 5 )) and the proper fund-raising activities of CNEWA.((Ibid., section 10))
The next year the Holy Father sent Msgr. Amleto G. Cicognani, the Assessor of the Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church, to the United States as his personal representative to convey his dispositions for CNEWA and to see to their implementation. On 6 June 1931, a special meeting of CNEWA’s Board of Directors was held in New York City for the purpose of reorganizing CNEWA in accordance with the directives of the Holy Father. At that meeting, the Archbishop of New York was elected its President and Treasurer, and CNEWA was placed entirely under hierarchical control.((Cf. Minutes of a meeting of the Directors of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, 6 June 1931))
The satisfaction of Pope Pius XI with these new arrangements was communicated to the Archbishop of New York((Luigi Cardinal Sincero, Secretary of the Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church, letter to Patrick Cardinal Hayes, Archbishop of New York, 6 August 1931)) and to the Cardinal Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church.((Eugenio Cardinal Pacelli, Secretary of State of His Holiness, letter to Luigi Cardinal Sincero, Secretary of the Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church, 20 August 1931)) The pope also made some further dispositions for CNEWA. They included the provision that it was to remain under the presidency of the Cardinal Archbishop of New York,((“1). La C.N.E.W.A. rimane, come ente a se, sotto la presidenza dell’E.mo Cardinale Arcivescovo di New York;…” (Ibid.) )) a charge to the Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church to furnish information to the Secretary of CNEWA about the Church in the Orient,((“I.) La S.C. pro Eccl. Orient. dovra constantemente fornire al Segretario Nazionale della C.N.E.W.A. informazioni di carattere religiose e morale sulle cristianita cattoliche d’Oriente, onde metterlo in grado di svolgere attraverso la C.N.E.W.A. stessa, un’efficace opera illustrativa e intellettuale, che serva a far conoscere l’Oriente, le sue missioni e i suoi bisogni;” (Sincero, letter to Hayes, op. cit.) )) a mandate to CNEWA also to concern itself with public relations and the education of the faithful about the condition of the communities of the East,((“II.) l’attivita della C.N.E.W.A., oltre che con quelle forme particolari che l’E.V. credera bene, volta a volta, di farle adottare, si svolgera, d’ordinario, con pubblicita su giornali e riviste e con mantenere, =a mezzo di foglietti di propaganda e di lettere periodiche=, contatto con i benefattori dei quali essa conosce i nomi; e neppure e esclusa una saggia divulgazione delle questioni cattoliche=orientali attraverso conferenze che occasionalmente voglia tenere lo stesso Segretario della C.N.E.W.A. o altri sacerdoti e propagandisti, sempre d’intesa con l’E.V.” (Ibid.)
“II). Tale attivita dovra essere sopratutto volta ad un lavoro di divulgazione sullo stato del Cattolicismo nel Vicino Oriente e in Russia, e cio mediante pubblicita sui periodici cattolici, e con ogni altro mezzo che si riveli atto ad illustrare ai fedeli le reali condizioni religiose e morali delle comunita dell’Oriente.
“III). Altro compito principale della C.N.E.W.A sara di mantenere nutrito contatto con i benefattori dei quali possiede gli elenchi, segnalando loro, con lettere personali e foglietti periodici di propaganda, le condizioni delle missioni, ed invitandoli a generosa contribuzione per la Mission Sunday.” (Pacelli, letter to Sincero, 20 August 1931, op. cit.) )) and some additional instructions about the apportionment and handling of the Mission Sunday collection.((Cf. Sincero, ibid., section IV, and Pacelli, ibid., sections III and IV ))
From this point forward, the role and proper activities of CNEWA were clear. The renewed satisfaction of the Holy See was communicated to the Archbishop of New York as President of CNEWA,((“His Eminence stated that the letters received from the Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church showed that the Holy See is satisfied with the work of the Association. He mentioned the gratitude of His Eminence Cardinal Sincero for the generosity of the benefactors and the support that is being given  to the missions in the Near East by the Association.” (Minutes of a Meeting of the Directors of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, 8 October 1934) )) and the funds obtained from the Mission Sunday collection or procured directly by CNEWA itself, such as Mass stipends, educational burses, designated gifts, and other special contributions, were regularly forwarded to the Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church or to other institutions as requested by the Holy Father or by the Congregation.((Ibid., “Synopsis of Financial Statement, Sept. 1, 1931 to Aug. 31, 1934” ))
CNEWA continued to operate under its Pennsylvania civil charter until 14 December 1942, when it was re-incorporated according to the laws of the State of New York.((“SECOND: The purposes for which this corporation is to be formed are: “To support the pastoral mission and institutions of the Catholic Churches of the East and to provide humanitarian assistance to the needy and afflicted without regard to nationality, race or religion, particularly in the Near or Middle East, Eastern Europe, Western Asia and also in other lands, and to further the spiritual welfare of the peoples therein; in relation thereto, to aid in erecting, equipping and maintaining churches, chapels, convents and appurtenant structures deemed necessary or useful; to aid in the organization, preparation, direction, support and maintenance of churches, chapels, missions, priests and missionaries in and for such purposes; for the accomplishing of its corporate purposes and the defraying of expenses incidental to the operations of the corporation, and subject to such limitations as may be prescribed by law, to solicit, accept, acquire, by grant, gift, purchase, devise or bequest, and to hold, possess, enjoy, hire, lease, sell and dispose of property, real, personal or mixed, or any interest therein, and whether absolute, outright or in trust; to invest and keep invested any funds of the corporation and collect and receive the income therefrom for its corporate purposes.” (Certificate of Incorporation of Catholic Near East Welfare Association as amended 8 December 1992) ))
This reorganization of CNEWA and clarification of its mission still underlies the structure of CNEWA today.

II. LATER DEVELOPMENT OF CNEWA

After the tumultuous first five years, 1926-1931, when CNEWA was led by Father Edmund Walsh, the next significant stages in its development were the period 1931-1949, a time of steady growth and service to the Eastern Catholic churches; the entrusting of the newly established “Pontifical Mission for Palestine” to CNEWA in 1949 and the subsequent development of programs of emergency aid and social development; and, since 1985, the development of new structures for local program oversight, of ecumenical and interreligious activities, and of an expansion of CNEWA’s promotional activities through national offices.

In support of the Eastern Catholic churches

Following the intervention of the Oriental Congregation in 1931 and the clarification of the nature and mission of CNEWA, the organization began to concentrate its efforts on supporting the Eastern Catholic churches and the persons and institutions under the jurisdiction of the Oriental Congregation.
Initially, the staff of the Congregation were intimately involved in the work of CNEWA. An “Ufficio CNEWA” was created within the Congregation to coordinate the transmission of requests for funding and the disbursement of funds to and from CNEWA’s administrative center in New York City. The names of each donor to the work of CNEWA and the amounts of their contributions were sent to the Oriental Congregation, and the prefect of the Congregation himself would send a letter of acknowledgment and thanks to each.
As the years passed, since CNEWA was heavily involved in supporting institutions, especially the seminaries, novitiates, and orphanages of the Eastern Catholic churches, a sponsorship program was devised, with great success, to interest individuals in their support and to raise money for them. This, of course, tremendously increased the amount of correspondence and record keeping The Oriental Congregation decided to leave the acknowledgment of donor gifts to CNEWA’s general secretary in New York, while the disbursement of funds in support of institutions and projects continued to be made by the Congregation itself.

Emergency relief and social development

On 18 June 1949, out of his concern for the plight of Palestinian refugees in the aftermath of the Israeli-Arab struggle of the previous year, Pope Pius XII decided that the work of humanitarian and charitable assistance of the Holy See for Palestine and all those afflicted by war there was to be consolidated and formalized by the establishment of a special “Pontifical Mission for Palestine.”((“It has pleased the Holy Father, in his lively concern for Palestine and for all those affected by the recent war there, to set up a Pontifical Mission for Palestine.” (Eugene Cardinal Tisserant, Secretary, Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church, Instruction, 18 June 1949) )) Its direction was entrusted to the Secretary of CNEWA, and it was mandated to conduct its activities in Palestine and in the neighboring countries of the Middle East so as to make available to every exiled or needy Palestinian the charity of the pope and of all Catholics of the world.((“Invited to preside over this Mission is the Rev. Msgr. Thomas McMahon, National Secretary of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association in the U.S.A., and a person well known in the field of charity to the East.
“The Pontifical Mission, needless to say, will have its headquarters in Palestine, and will conduct its activities in that region and in the neighboring countries, so as to make available to every exiled or needy Palestinian the charity of the Pope and of all Catholics of the world.” (Ibid.) ))
Because it was only a few years after the conclusion of World War II and at that time the Catholic Church in the United States was in a better condition to support charitable aid than the church in Europe, the Holy See especially sought the help of U.S. Catholic agencies. CNEWA was asked to assist the Pontifical Mission for Palestine in accomplishing its work.((“We exhort relief agencies everywhere to assist your Mission in accomplishing its important work; and, in this regard, We address particularly those bodies to whom this appeal was made from the beginning: the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, Catholic Relief Services – National Catholic Welfare Conference, the Custody of the Holy Land, and the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre.” (Pope Paul VI, autographed letter to Our Beloved Son, Joseph T. Ryan, Our Domestic Prelate, President of the Pontifical Commission for Palestine, 7 October 1963) )) Since the Mission lacked civil status in the United States, CNEWA made appeals for its work and collected funds for it. CNEWA also provided the administrative and financial support necessary for the Pontifical Mission’s operations in addition to most of the means of assistance for the persons it served.((“Particularly praiseworthy is the vital contribution of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, which, through the unflagging generosity of the Catholics of the United States of America, provides most of the means of alleviating the pains of the homeless. (A.G. Cardinal Cicognani, Secretary of State of His Holiness, letter to the Right Reverend Monsignor John G. Nolan, President, Pontifical Mission for Palestine, 8 April 1968) ))
Better to direct this work, a field headquarters office for the Pontifical Mission was set up in Beirut. Because of political circumstances and to more effectively administer the program, other offices were later established in Jerusalem and Amman. Some years later a special office was set up in Rome to promote the projects of the Pontifical Mission among European donor organizations and agencies.
Although originally envisaged as a short-term, emergency program, the work of the Pontifical Mission necessarily continued in the uncertain and troubled arena of the Middle East. By 1967, it had evolved from providing emergency assistance for refugees to assisting an entire population living under martial law with few or weak social institutions. With the outbreak of the Lebanese civil war, the beneficiaries of the work of the Pontifical Mission began to be not only Palestinians but also Lebanese. With the Gulf War, its work extended to Iraqi refugees. By the time of its 50th anniversary in 1999 it had become and was generally recognized as the Holy See’s overall development agency for the Middle East.((“…it is in no small way through you and your support of the Pontifical Mission for Palestine that the Church is able to be actively and effectively present in the Holy Land and in the Middle East.  I pray that you and all those associated with the work of the Mission will be renewed in faith and love as you seek ever better ways of helping those in need not only of material support but especially of opportunities for personal and social development.  This is the surest path for establishing a true and lasting peace in the lives of the peoples of the Middle East.” (Pope John Paul II, address to the representatives of the Pontifical Mission for Palestine received in audience on 9 December 1999 on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of its foundation.) ))
The Pontifical Mission for Palestine is canonically distinct from CNEWA; however in practice they have a unified administration. The Pontifical Mission, in addition to its proper activities of emergency aid and social development, also administers programs of CNEWA. In effect, it functions as the Middle East operating agency of CNEWA.
On the occasion of the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, Pope Pius XII, in an autographed letter to its President, Francis Cardinal Spellman, congratulated CNEWA for its work of safeguarding and fostering the faith among the Catholics of the Oriental rites and for its magnanimous cooperation with the Pontifical Mission. The Holy Father expressed his continuous need for assistance for all the peoples of the Near East and Eastern Catholics and his hopes and prayers for the expansion of the membership and work of CNEWA.((Cf. Pius XII, op. cit.))

New structures for local program oversight

To assist the transmissions of funds for CNEWA’s needy child sponsorship program in Ethiopia, the “Ufficio CNEWA” within the Congregation for the Eastern Churches engaged the services of local staff in Addis Ababa. Meanwhile, the New York office of CNEWA was utilizing the part-time services of local Ethiopian staff for project oversight. As responsibility for the disbursement of needy child sponsorship funds moved from the “Ufficio CNEWA” and the Congregation in Rome to CNEWA’s administrative headquarters in New York, it was decided to organize in 1986 a regional office in Addis Ababa to assume responsibility for all programmatic disbursements, whether subsidies to institutions or grants for programs and projects.
While D. Simon Cardinal Lourdusamy was Prefect of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches, responsibility for needy child sponsorship program disbursements and then seminarian and novice sponsorship program disbursements was transferred to the New York office of CNEWA.
When Achille Cardinal Silvestrini became the Prefect of the Congregation, he encouraged CNEWA to manage the transmissions of all funds, including grants for projects and programs, directly from New York, rather than through the “Ufficio CNEWA” within the Congregation. Later, on 11 June 1994, these procedures were formalized and, in response to Cardinal Silvestrini’s request, the “Ufficio CNEWA” was removed from the Congregation and joined to the existing Pontifical Mission office in Rome. The changes were considered ad experimentum for a period of five years.((“The Congregation for the Oriental Churches has no objection regarding these ten points, and I, therefore, hereby express the agreement of this Congregation to their implementation for an experimental period of five years. From the Vatican, 11 June 1944, Achille Cardinal Silvestrini, Prefect. Miroslav Maruysn, Secretary” (Ten point document entitled “Relocation of the CNEWA Vatican Office”) )) In 1999, they were deemed satisfactory and made permanent.
With the war and the increased post-war tensions between Ethiopia and Eritrea, an auxiliary CNEWA office, affiliated with the regional CNEWA office in Addis Ababa, was established in Asmara to serve Eritrea. By 2003, it was judged opportune to make this a separate regional office in its own right.
The same year, another regional office was established in Ernakulam to ensure better oversight of the extensive program of CNEWA in India, and responsibility for much of the operational detail concerned with institutional subsidies and the agency’s three person-to-person sponsorship programs was transferred to the new office.
A characteristic of all of these CNEWA and Pontifical Mission offices is that they are available to assist the dicasteries of the Holy See, especially the Congregation for the Eastern Churches, as well as any and all Catholic donor agencies in assessmentof local applications for subsidies or grants, in the administration of programmatic disbursements, and in supplying appropriate and supporting reports.
The innovative programs of personal sponsorship of the education and formation of individual seminarians and novices and of the care of individual orphaned or needy children developed by CNEWA had great success. Also the membership of CNEWA gradually expanded to include Catholics in Canada and, to a lesser extent, Mexico and other countries, to the point that CNEWA became the principal animator and collector in North America of assistance for the Near East.((“The present canonical mission of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association is to be an animator and collector of assistance in North America for the needy in other parts of the world…” (Wladyslaw Cardinal Rubin, Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Churches, letter to the Most Rev. John J. O’Connor, D.D., Archbishop of New York and President of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, 9 May 1985) ))

Ecumenical and interreligious activities

The restructuring of CNEWA initiated in 1985 under the presidency of John Cardinal O’Connor not only led to a major expansion of programmatic activities and the development of additional regional offices, but to a renewed and greater emphasis on the ecumenical aspect of CNEWA’s foundational mission. Although the primary beneficiaries of CNEWA’s funding activities continued to be the Eastern Catholic churches and their institutions and programs, increasingly support began to be given to the Orthodox and other churches in the countries within CNEWA’s area of service.
This was a conscious and deliberate return to CNEWA’s original mandate, inherited from the Catholic Union, to work for the union of the Orthodox churches with the Holy See and to make CNEWA active in the “dialogue of charity.” By extension, some deployment of CNEWA’s resources also began to be made to assist Muslims and other non-Christians through their participation in CNEWA’s works of charity.

Expansion of CNEWA

With the strong encouragement of not only its own episcopal Board of Trustees but also the Prefects of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches, first Achille Cardinal Silvestrini and then Ignace Moussa I Cardinal Daoud, plans were developed for the creation of branch, national offices of CNEWA to raise public awareness of the Eastern churches and the countries in which they are located and to solicit funds for their subvention.((“For several years this Congregation has been studying the possibility of expanding this pontifical work in favor of the Eastern Catholic Churches to other countries, especially those with a significant presence of Eastern Catholic faithful. At the Encounter of Eastern Catholic hierarchs from the Americas and Oceania convoked by this Congregation in November, 1999, it was recommended that the expansion of C.N.E.W.A. to Canada, Latin America, and Australia be studied.” (Ignace Moussa I Cardinal Daoud, Syrian Catholic Patriarch Emeritus of Antioch, Prefect of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches, letter to the Most Reverend Jacques Berthelet, C.S.V., President, Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, 5 June 2002) ))
Under the leadership of Archbishop Marcel Gervais of Ottawa, “CNEWA Canada” was organized and incorporated.  This prompted the separation of a distinct “CNEWA United States” and a restructuring of the governance of the central, mother organization of CNEWA.
Presently, in response to expressions of interest and requests from Eastern Catholic bishops in Australia and Latin America and to initiatives of the “Catholica Unio” in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland seeking closer collaboration with CNEWA, the development of other national or regional offices is under study.

III. MISSION AND GOALS

CNEWA is a special agency of the Holy See, an international association of the Christian faithful,((“Ad erigendas consociationes publicas auctoritas comptens est: 1. pro consociationibus universalibus atque internationalibus, Sancta Sedes…” (Codex Iuris Canonici, Can. 312) )) established by Pope Pius XI in 1926 out of his concern for Russia and the Near East.((Cf. Sincero, letter to Gasparri, op. cit., and Gasparri op. cit., passim
“These sufferings, moreover, and the petitions for help, because of their very nature and the condition of the countries where they exist, still continue and will doubtless long continue.  God alone can tell the time when, happily, Our assistance will no longer be needed.  For these reasons, it was judged proper, not to say necessary, to constitute the CATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOCIATION on a permanent basis. It is, therefore, a supreme consolation to Us to know that the work has been so founded and We impart a special benediction for its perseverance. Having thus taken stable and permanent form it well merits to be called Pontifical both for the benefits it has bestowed in the past and the promise it holds for the future.” (Pius XI, letter to Walsh, op. cit.) )) It supports the pastoral mission of the Catholic churches of the East—the needs of the churches, institutions and persons under the jurisdiction of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches and the Permanent Interdicasterial Commission for the Church in Eastern Europe((“…I am terminating the Pontifical Council [sic] for Russia, giving thanks to God for all the good work which it has brought to the Church and to the many faithful of Russian descent for nearly 70 years, and also thanking everyone who worked during those many harsh years to fulfil its important function.  At the same time, in accord with the norm of the Apostolic Constitution Pastor bonus (Art.21, §2), I am establishing the Permanent Interdicasterial Commission for the Church in Eastern Europe…” (Pope John Paul II, Motu Proprio Europae orientalis, 15 January 1993) ))—and provides humanitarian assistance to the needy and afflicted without regard to nationality or creed. It also has been entrusted by the Holy Father with responsibility for promoting the union of the Catholic and Orthodox churches. It raises and distributes funds to help meet the material and spiritual needs of the people it serves.((“1. D’ora in poi tutte le organizzazioni che esplicano negli Stati Uniti di America la loro attivita in aiuto ai Russi ed alle regioni del vicino Oriente, ossia in generale per tutte le finalita proprie della S. C. Pro Ecclesia Orientali e della Commissione Pro Russia debbono unirsi e rimanere unite in una sola organizzazione, sotto una unica direzione.” (Sincero, ibid.)
“La C.N.E.W.A. rimane quale associazione permanente per gli scopi e le necessita spirituali delle Chiese, Missioni, Istituti e persone dipendenti dalla S.C. per la Chiesa Orientale e dalla Pontificia Commissione per la Russia;…” (Pacelli, letter to Sincero, 28 June 1930, op. cit.)
“In this year of grace the solemn celebration of the fifteenth centenary of the Council of Chalcedon turns Our thoughts and Our affections in an especial manner to Our beloved children of the venerable Christian Churches of the East. It was on their behalf, to fulfil an important need, that the Pontifical Mission Aid Society – the Catholic Near East Welfare Association – was erected in the year 1926,…
“With the effectiveness which springs from unity of effort, it has worked with a will, throughout the twenty-five years of its existence, to safeguard and foster the precious heritage of the Faith among untold numbers of Catholics of Oriental Rite. These faithful are chiefly concentrated in the various countries of the vast expanse of territory which extends from Central and Eastern Europe to North-East Africa and the Near East, and also along the Malabar coast of India, and the beneficent work of the Association has been a constant support to their clergy and religious.” (Pius XII, op. cit.) ))
CNEWA works on behalf of the Christian East—that is, those lands in which, from ancient times, the majority of Christians are members of the various Eastern churches. Its mandate extends to the churches and peoples of the Middle East, Northeast Africa, India, and Eastern Europe and to Eastern Catholics everywhere.((Pius XII, ibid.
“Congregazione per le Chiese Orientali…ha potere esclusivo nelle seguenti regioni: Egitto e penisola del Sinai, Eritrea ed Etiopia del Nord, Albania meridionale, Bulgaria, Cipro, Grecia, Iran, Iraq, Libano, Palestina, Siria, Giordania, Turchia (Cost. Ap. Pastor Bonus, nn. 56-61) e nell’Afghanistan (ud. 7 ag. 1950).” (Annuario Pontificio, 1990, Note Storiche, pp. 1644-1645)
“…Pio XI stabiliva che il clero e i fedeli russi di rito latino “qui in patrio solo degunt” rimanessero soggetti alla Commissione per la Russia…” (Ibid., p. 1641) )) It goals include the encouragement of and provision of assistance to projects and programs of pastoral support, humanitarian assistance, interfaith communication, and public awareness.

Pastoral support

Preparing church leadership. CNEWA assists local episcopal conferences, bishops, priests, religious, and lay leaders to build and maintain a living church. It helps in the recruitment, education and spiritual formation of priests, deacons, religious brothers and sisters, lay leaders and missionaries.((“SECOND: The purposes for which this corporation is to be formed are: “To propagate and spread the doctrines and practices of the Roman Catholic Religion particularly in the Near or Middle East, Eastern Europe, Western Asia and also in other lands, and to further the spiritual welfare of the peoples therein; in relation thereto, to aid in erecting, equipping and maintaining churches, chapels, convents and appurtenant structures deemed necessary or useful; to aid in the organization, preparation, direction, support and maintenance of churches, chapels, missions, priests and missionaries in and for such purposes;…” (Certificate of Incorporation of Catholic Near East Welfare Association) ))

Facilitating priestly ministry. CNEWA, through Mass offerings received from its benefactors, not only ensures prayers for their intentions but also provides material support to priests to help facilitate their ministry.((Ibid.))

Building church institutions. CNEWA helps build, equip and maintain seminaries and convents, churches and chapels, rectories, parish schools and other structures necessary for pastoral purposes.((Ibid.))

Assisting the Holy See. CNEWA assists the Holy Father by collaborating with and supporting the work of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches, the Permanent Interdicasterial Commission for the Church in Eastern Europe, the Pontifical Mission for Palestine,((“In the hour of need, in the tragic events which, in recent times, have saddened the lives and darkened the future of so many of Our dearly-loved children in the Holy Land, the Association gave admirable proof of that spirit of Christian fellowship by providing essential supplies to the thousands who were forced to flee their homesteads.  By the magnanimous co-operation which it is daily giving to the Pontifical Mission for Palestine, it is nobly seconding Our efforts to alleviate the desperate misery which was undermining the spirit of those rendered homeless and workless.” (Pius XII, op. cit.) )) the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue and other agencies of the Holy See.

Humanitarian assistance

Responding to urgent human needs. CNEWA provides emergency assistance including food, clothing, medical care, temporary shelter and other basic necessities for the relief of suffering people, regardless of religious belief or nationality.((“II. The purposes for which the said Corporation is to be formed are as follows:  Without profit to the Corporation or its members to solicit and procure the voluntary contribution of funds for the relief of suffering people, particularly children, regardless of religious belief, in Greece, Turkey, Armenia and other countries known as the Near East; to use and apply such funds for the care of neglected and orphaned children and to otherwise alleviate distress among people of these countries by transferring funds so procured to individual societies, hospitals, orphan asylums or other institutions in said countries, organized for said purposes or in such other manner as the Corporation may deem advisable for the relief of such distress; and in connection with the foregoing objects to establish and maintain such organizations and institutions and to utilize and employ such agencies as the Corporation may deem proper.” (Charter of The Catholic Near East Welfare Association)
“Formed from the union of the three charitable organizations promoted in the United States of America, during the years immediately following the first World War, for the relief of the sorely- tried and suffering members of the Church in the countries of the Near East, the Association emulated the example and fine zeal and the spirit of all-embracing charity which fired the priest founders of these organizations….
Scattered throughout these regions are numerous seminaries, schools, orphanages, hospitals and leprosaria which are tangible testimonies to the zealous work of the Directors of the Association and to the charity of the thousands of generous benefactors whose personal sacrifices have rendered such works possible.” (Pius XII, op. cit.) ))

Rehabilitating dwellings and institutions. CNEWA builds, repairs and renovates homes and educational, medical, charitable, religious and cultural institutions and assists these institutions to maintain and augment their programs.((Ibid. ))

Sustaining a network of human services. CNEWA, in collaboration with local church leaders and other agencies, establishes and maintains programs and institutions that care for needy children, the physically and mentally handicapped, the sick, the indigent, the homeless and the elderly.((Ibid.))

Collaborating with similar agencies. CNEWA collaborates with international, national and local pastoral, humanitarian and educational agencies and organizations committed to objectives similar to its own.  It participates in the joint funding of programs and projects.((Ibid.))

Contributing to education. CNEWA supports primary, secondary, vocational and higher educational institutions and offers modest scholarship assistance to enable the disadvantaged to help themselves through specialized training and university-level education.

Advancing human development. CNEWA addresses and responds to developmental needs, complementing the work of specialized agencies, and makes grants for small scale development projects and programs.

Interfaith communication

Promoting Christian unity. CNEWA promotes Christian unity, especially among the churches of the East and the Holy See. It encourages and supports programs and projects of ecumenical awareness, education, formation and dialogue((“2. In particolare le due organizzazione, che fino ad ora hanno lavorato in quel campo, cioe la “Catholic Near  East Welfare Association” e la “Catholica Unio” debbono unirsi e fondersi in una sola associazione.  Il titolo di questa sera: “Catholic Near East Welfare Association”, quale titolo adatto e sufficiente per esprimere lo intento generale di tutte quelle sopradette organizzazioni, rimanendo pero ben inteso e dichiarato per sempre che esso comprende anche la “Catholic Unio” e le finalita che questa finora se era proposte.” (Sincero, letter to Gasparri, op. cit.)
“II). Tale attivita dovra essere sopratutto volta ad un lavoro di divulgazione sullo stato del Cattolicismo nel Vicino Oriente e in Russia, e cio mediante pubblicita sui periodici cattolici, e con ogni altro mezzo che si riveli atto ad illustrare ai fedeli le reali condizioni religiose e morali delle comunita dell’Oriente.” (Pacelli, letter to Sincero, 20 August 1931, op. cit.) )) and collaborates with other churches in pastoral and humanitarian activities.

Fostering interreligious dialogue. CNEWA promotes fraternal relations with non-Christians, especially Jews and Muslims, by activities fostering mutual understanding and respect and by collaboration in works of human development.

Public awareness

Raising consciousness about the East. CNEWA publicizes the religious, cultural, social and economic conditions of the churches and peoples of the East. It disseminates, through printed and electronic mass media, information about their history, traditions and faiths.((“II.) l’attivita della C.N.E.W.A., oltre che con quelle forme particolari che l’E.V. credera bene, volta a volta, di farle adottare, si svolgera, d’ordinario, con pubblicita su giornali e riviste e con mantenere, =a mezzo di foglietti di propaganda e di lettere periodiche=, contatto con i benefattori dei quali essa conosce i nomi; e neppure e esclusa una saggia divulgazione delle questioni cattoliche=orientali attraverso conferenze che occasionalmente voglia tenere lo stesso Segretario della C.N.E.W.A. o altri sacerdoti e propagandisti, sempre d’intesa con l’E.V.” (Sincero, letter to Hayes, op. cit.)
“II). Tale attivita dovra essere sopratutto volta ad un lavoro di divulgazione sullo stato del Cattolicismo nel Vicino Oriente e in Russia, e cio  mediante pubblicita sui periodici cattolici, e con ogni altro mezzo che si riveli atto ad illustrare ai fedeli le reali condizioni religiose e morali delle comunita dell’Oriente.” (Pacelli, letter to Sincero, 20 August 1931, op. cit.) ))

Supporting educational programs. CNEWA, through its regular support for Middle East studies and other programs of public awareness and academic formation, helps raise consciousness about the conditions of the peoples and churches of the East and prepares religious and lay professionals to work for them.

Informing and animate members. CNEWA maintains close contact with its donors and members by means of personal communications encouraging their interest in CNEWA’s activities and their support for the missionary work of the church.((“III. Altro compito principale della C.N.E.W.A. sara di mantenere nutrito contatto con i benefattori dei quali possiede gli elenchi, segnalando loro, con lettere personali e foglietti periodici de propaganda, le condizioni delle missioni, ed invitandoli a generosa contribuzione per la Mission Sunday.” (Pacelli, Ibid.) ))

Encouraging intercultural communication. CNEWA promotes communication and mutual understanding and appreciation among people of different traditions, cultures, and faiths. It encourages person-to-person contacts between its supporters and people in the lands it serves, especially through its seminarian, novice, and needy child sponsorship programs. It also encourages person-to-person contacts through programs of study, travel and pilgrimage.

Advocating justice and peace. CNEWA advocates and promotes respect for human dignity and human rights, understanding among peoples, and justice and peace.

Administration

Procuring funds to support operations. CNEWA recruits new members and benefactors through direct mail, advertising and other marketing programs and enlists their support of its domestic and overseas operations.  It also solicits financial support through corporate, foundation, and planned giving programs.

Assuring effective management. CNEWA is committed to the recruitment of well-motivated and dedicated staff and to the efficient and cost effective management of its developmental, financial, administrative, informational, programmatic and external services.

IV. STRUCTURE

CNEWA, although remaining one unified institution in accordance with canon law and the directives of the Holy See, utilizes as many civil corporate structures as may be necessary to the fulfillment of its mission.

Governance

Board of Trustees. The governing body of CNEWA is a Board of Trustees.((Cf. The Religious Corporation Law of the State of New York, Article 2
“The Trustees shall constitute the governing body of the Corporation and shall have such powers and authority as shall be conferred upon them by the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation, these By-Laws, and the general law.” (By-Laws of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association (As amended 17 November 1988), IV. TRUSTEES, 4. Powers) )) The Archbishop of New York is a Trustee ex officio;((“The number of Trustees shall be nine, one of whom shall be the Archbishop of New York, ex officio; the remaining eight Trustees shall be elective Trustees. The Archbishop of New York shall hold the office of Trustee for a term which coincides with the term of his office as Archbishop of New York.” (Ibid., IV. TRUSTEES, 1. Number and Term of Office) )) the remaining Trustees are elected for terms of four years by the Board itself,((“The elective Trustees shall be elected for the terms and in the manner specified in Section 2 of this Article IV.” (Ibid.)
“At each Annual Meeting of Trustees…a number of elective Trustees equal to that of those whose terms have expired shall be elected for the term of four years.” (Ibid., IV. TRUSTEES, 2. Election and Terms of Elective Trustees) )) originally from among the cardinals, archbishops, and bishops of the United States((“5. Sara opportuno che l’Emmo Card. Hayes si compiaccia poi di pregare tutti gli Emmi Sig. Cardinali degli Stati Uniti, qualche Arcivescovo e Vescovo, perche vogliano formare con lui stesso un Comitato direttivo…” (Sincero, letter to Gasparri, op. cit.) )) and now also from the hierarchies of other countries where national branches of CNEWA have been established. The Trustees meet at least once every year on a date fixed by the Archbishop of New York.((“The Trustees of the Corporation shall meet at least once every year on a date fixed by the President.” (By-Laws, op. cit., V. MEETINGS, 1. Annual Meeting) ))

President. The Archbishop of New York is ex officio the President of CNEWA((“1) La C.N.E.W.A. rimane, come ente a se, sotto la presidenza dell’E.mo Cardinale Arcivescovo di New York;…” (Pacelli, letter to Sincero, 20 August 1931, op. cit.) )) and Chairman of the Board of Trustees. He is responsible for the overall supervision and direction of CNEWA.((“The Archbishop of New York shall hold the office of President for a term which coincides with his office as Archbishop of New York.  The President shall preside at all meetings of the Trustees and generally supervise and direct the activities of the Corporation.  He shall have full power to make, execute, and deliver all documents on behalf of the Corporation.  He shall appoint all Special Committees and shall fill vacancies in all appointed committees for the unexpired term thereof. He shall perform such other duties and shall exercise such other powers as may be assigned him by the Board of Trustees….” (By-Laws, op. cit., VI. OFFICERS, 5. President) ))

Vice-President. The Vice-President of CNEWA is elected by the Board of Trustees from among its members at its Annual Meeting for a term of one year. In the event of the absence, disability or death of the President, the Vice-President presides at all meetings of the Board of Trustees and in all other respects performs the duties of the President.((“The Vice-President shall be elected by the Board of Trustees from among its members at its Annual Meeting.  The Vice-President shall serve for a term of one year or until the expiration of his term as Trustee, whichever is shorter in duration, and may be re- elected.  In the event of the absence, disability, or death of the President, the Vice-President shall preside at all meetings of the Board of Trustees and in all other respects perform the duties of the President.  He shall perform such other duties and shall exercise such other powers as may be assigned him by the Board of Trustees….” (Ibid., VI. OFFICERS, 6. Vice-President) ))

Treasurer. The Archbishop of New York is ex officio the Treasurer of CNEWA.((Cf. Minutes of a meeting of the Directors of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, 6 June 1931)) He is responsible for the overall management of the business affairs and assets of CNEWA.((“The Archbishop of New York shall hold the office of Treasurer for a term which coincides with his office as Archbishop of New York.  The Treasurer shall be charged with the general management of the business affairs and property of the Corporation.  He shall have full power to sign all checks, drafts, and notes on behalf of the Corporation and shall have the custody of the bank accounts and other assets of the Corporation. He shall have full power to make, execute, and deliver all contracts. He shall prepare a statement on the financial status of the Corporation to be presented to Board of Trustees at its Annual Meeting. He shall perform such other duties and exercise such other powers as may be assigned to him by the Board of Trustees….” (By-Laws, op. cit., VI. OFFICERS, 7. Treasurer) ))

Secretary General. The Secretary General of CNEWA is nominated by the President and elected by the Board of Trustees at its Annual Meeting to serve for such term as the Board may determine. The Secretary General is the chief executive officer of CNEWA. He is responsible for directing it, under the supervision of the President, in support of the mission, plans, and policies approved by the Board of Trustees.((“7.) L’E.mo Signor Cardinale Hayes, sentito Monsignor Delegato Apostolico, nominera, scegliendolo dal clero secolare, un Direttore degli offici della C.N.E.W.A., con incombenze di Segretario;…” (Pacelli, letter to Sincero, 28 June 1930, op. cit.)
“The Secretary General shall be nominated by the President and elected by the Board of Trustees at its Annual Meeting to serve for such term as the Board may designate. The Secretary General shall, under the direction of the President, transact all the routine business of the Corporation and put into effect the policies and regulations adopted by the Trustees.  The Secretary General shall attend all meetings of the Trustees and shall keep the minutes and records of the Board of Trustees and maintain a minute book of the affairs and meetings of the Board of Trustees. He shall see that due and proper notice is given of all meetings of the Trustees. He shall have and retain custody of the seal of the Corporation and shall have the power to affix the seal to all documents and to certify to the correctness of any transcript of any part of the records of the Corporation. He shall perform such other duties and exercise such other powers as may be assigned to him by the Board of Trustees…or the President.” (By-Laws, op. cit., VI. OFFICERS, 8. Secretary General) ))

Associate Secretary General. An Associate Secretary General of CNEWA is nominated by the Secretary General and elected by the Board of Trustees at its Annual Meeting to serve for such term as the Board may determine. This Associate Secretary General assists the Secretary General in directing the operations of CNEWA in accordance with the strategic plans and evolving mission approved by the Secretary General. In the absence of the Secretary General, this Associate Secretary General performs the duties of the Secretary General.((“The Associate Secretary General shall be nominated by the Secretary General and elected by the Board of Trustees at its Annual Meeting to serve for such term as the Board may designate. The Associate Secretary General shall assist the Secretary General in transacting all the routine business of the Corporation and in putting into effect the policies and regulations adopted by the Trustees. In the event of the absence, disability, or death of the Secretary General he shall perform the duties of the Secretary General. He shall perform such other duties and exercise such other powers as may be assigned to him by the Board of Trustees…or the Secretary General.” (Ibid., VI. OFFICERS, 9. Associate Secretary General) ))

National Secretaries. In those countries where national branches of CNEWA have been created, a National Secretary is nominated by the Secretary General and elected by the Board of Directors of the national branch at its Annual Meeting to serve for such term as the Secretary General may propose and the Board may determine. Each National Secretary is the chief executive officer of the national branch of CNEWA. He is responsible for supervising the affairs and operations of the national branch in cooperation with the Secretary General.

Other officials. Other Associate, Under, and Assistant Secretaries General, and other officers are appointed by the Secretary General to serve for such term as he may designate.

Headquarters

CNEWA, as a corporation incorporated under the religious corporations law of the State of New York State, maintains its principal office in that state.((“FOURTH: Its principal office is to be situated in the Borough of Manhattan, City, County and State of New York.” (Certificate of Incorporation of Catholic Near East Welfare Association) )) As a public association of the Christian faithful placed under the direction and presidency of the Archbishop of New York by the Holy See,((“4. E’ necessario che la suddetta Associazione “Catholic Near East Welfare Association” sia messa sotto l’immediata direzione di un Vescovo.  Attesi i precedenti e l’interessamento benevolo gia personalmente prestato dall’ Emmo Sig. Card. Hayes, questa S. C. con la Commissione Pro Russia trova quanto mai opportuno che l’Arcivescovo di New York sia la persona designata a tale scopo e quindi desiderabile che l’ Emmo Card. Hayes sia inteso e dalla S. Sede pregato a darvi il suo consenso.” (Sincero, letter to Gasparri, op. cit.)
“6.) La C.N.E.W.A….dovra pero organizzarsi ed esercitare la sua attivita strettamente a norma del suo Statuto originario, fissato nella lettera del 10 Marzo 1926 dell’E.mo Card. Sincero all’E.mo Cardinale Pietro Gasparri: quindi…non solo sotto il benevolo interessamento dell’E.mo Cardinale Hayes, Arcivescovo di New York, ma ancora sotto la sua immediata e personale direzione, colle norme esposte al N. 5 della precitata lettera, salvo le modifiche espresse nella presente.” (Pacelli, letter to Sincero, 28 June 1930, op. cit.)
“1). La C.N.E.W.A. rimane, come ente a se, sotto la presidenza dell’E.mo Cardinale Arcivescovo di New York;…” (Pacelli, letter to Sincero, 20 August 1931, op. cit.) )) CNEWA maintains its central office Rome and considers its New York office as its administrative headquarters.

Membership

Any person who approves of the purposes of CNEWA and who agrees to submit to its rules and regulations is eligible for membership in CNEWA. Membership consists of active members and passive members as regulated by the Board of Trustees.(( “Any person who approves of the purposes of the Corporation and who agrees to submit to its rules and regulations is eligible for membership in the Corporation. Membership consists of active members and passive members as shall be regulated by the Board of Trustees.” (By-Laws, op. cit., III. MEMBERS, 1. Membership) ))
The active members of CNEWA are the Trustees themselves.((“Active members of the Corporation shall be those persons who from time to time constitute its Board of Trustees.” (Ibid., III. MEMBERS, 2. Active Members) )) The passive members are the voluntary donors and benefactors of CNEWA.((“Passive members are voluntary donors for spiritual purposes and acquire neither voice nor voting rights nor any interest in the assets of the Corporation or their distribution.” (Ibid., III. MEMBERS, 3. Passive Members) ))

Policies

The policies of CNEWA are determined by its Board of Trustees.  CNEWA conducts its activities in accordance with the dispositions of the Holy Father and the policies of the Holy See.

Cf. ARCHIVE DOCUMENTS

ENDNOTES

CNEWA’S Bifurcation

What happened? Simply this: CNEWA (Catholic Near East Welfare Association) has been bifurcated — in fact, not once, but twice!
“Bifurcation” is used rarely in American English, but more often in Indian English parlance. It means, of course, division into two forks, parts, or branches.
I usually associate it with the announcement of the creation of a new diocese in India. The original diocese is usually said to have been bifurcated.
Well, the same thing has happened to CNEWA.
Ever since its establishment by Pope Pius XI in 1926, CNEWA has been centered in the United States but always understood to be an international, Vatican agency.
Although its administrative headquarters is in New York City, it is not associated with the Archdiocese of New York nor with the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
In recent years, we explored the possibility of opening a branch of CNEWA in Canada with a legal identity as a registered Canadian charity. That, of course, would offer an income tax advantage to Canadian donors.
On 30 October 2003, with the encouragement of the Holy See and led by Archbishop Marcel Gervais of Ottawa, five Canadian archbishops constituted “CNEWA Canada.”
Joining Archbishop Gervais were Marc Cardinal Ouellet of Quebec and Primate of Canada; Ukrainian Metropolitan Archbishop of Winnipeg, Michael Bzdel, C.Ss.R.; and Archbishops Adam Exner, O.M.I., of Vancouver and Terrence Prendergast, S.J., of Halifax.

Creating CNEWA Canada prompted a closer look at the situation of CNEWA in the United States. Our New York office has always had a dual dimension — it promotes our work in the United States and it serves as the agency’s international administrative center.
Logic suggested creating another national CNEWA organization distinct from the international agency. So, on 11 November 2003 our Board of Trustees did exactly that.
“CNEWA United States” is constituted by Cardinals William Keeler of Baltimore and Francis George, O.M.I., of Chicago; Archbishops Francis Schulte, emeritus of New Orleans, and Alexander Brunett of Seattle; Bishops Daniel Reilly of Worcester, John Nevins of Venice, and Joseph Fiorenza of Galveston-Houston; and Ukrainian Bishop Basil Losten of Stamford.
This new branch is responsible for CNEWA’s promotional and fund-raising activities in the United States.
The international organization continues to be led by the Archbishop of New York, Edward Cardinal Egan, now joined by the chairs and vice chairs of the two national branches of CNEWA.
Years ago, when Catholic Near East Welfare Association was founded, it was hoped that it would gradually spread around the world. It seems to have gotten off to a slow start, but it is finally moving in that direction.


(Published in
CNEWA World, 30:2, March 2004)

BU Governance – Historical Overview

I

Foundation and early organization

On 8 June 1973 a meeting was held at the Congregation for the Eastern Churches to discuss the plans for an institute of higher education in Bethlehem. It was attended by Archbishop Mario Brini, Secretary of the Congregation, Brother Charles Buttimer, Superior General of the Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools, Archbishop Pio Laghi, Apostolic Delegate in Palestine and Jerusalem, and Brother Alphonse Hermans, Procurator General of the Institute.
On 26 June 1973 a second meeting was held at the Congregation attended by the Secretary of the Congregation, the Superior General of the Institute, and Brother Brendon Fitzgerald, future professor of the University.
On 2 July 1973 the Superior General of the Institute wrote to Cardinal Paul Philippe, Prefect of the Congregation, concerning plans for the University and the role of the Institute in its administration.
On 27 July 1973 the Secretary of the Congregation wrote the Superior General of the Institute, reviewing the steps taken to date to establish the new university and, in nine specific points, clarifying the general and fiscal responsibility for it.

      • Responsibility for starting the University was entrusted to a Holy Land commission consisting of the Apostolic Delegate, experts in higher education, local representatives, and others.
      • The commitments to date to the financial support of the University made by the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre and Catholic Near East Welfare Association were itemized.
      • The direction of the University and its programs of formation were entrusted to the Brothers of the Christian Schools.
      • The Congregation for the Eastern Churches undertook the financial support of the Brothers of the Christian Schools in their “enterprise universitaire de Bethleem”.
      • The overall commitments were made for a period of five years (1973-1978), while the specifics of the program and function of the University were approved for three years (1973-1976) and scheduled for review by the Congregation, the Apostolic Delegate, the Holy Land Commission and the Brothers of the Christian Schools at the end of that period.

Use of land and original buildings

On 2 October 1973 a contract was made between “L’Institut des Freres des Ecoles Chretiennes du District d’orient en Terre Sante” and “Bethlehem University.” It was signed by the Apostolic Delegate on behalf of the University. The principal provision of the contract was to give the use of the existing land and buildings of the Institute to the University indefinitely.

II

Civil incorporation

On 26 July 1976 the University was legally incorporated according to the law of the State of New Jersey as “Bethlehem University in the Holy Land.”  The certificate of incorporation provided that the Board of Trustees always consist of five trustees, ex officio: the President [now called Vice Chancellor] of Bethlehem University; the Provincial, Associate Provincial, and Director of Education of the La Salle Provincialate of the Brothers of the Christian Schools; and the Headmaster of Christian Brothers Academy at Lincroft, New Jersey.
Subsequently, the Board of Trustees of the civil Corporation met and adopted By-Laws (entitled “Bethlehem University of the Holy Land, P.O. Box 9, Bethlehem via Israel, By-Laws, Board of Trustees”). It consisted of five articles: Nature, Membership and Powers, Officers and Their Duties, Meetings, and Amendments to the By-Laws. The first article stated that “the Board of Trustees will establish a corresponding Board ‘in situ’ with full legal jurisdiction in all that pertains to the institution and to coordinate with this board.”

Formal agreement between the Congregation and the Institute

On 4 May 1979 a formal agreement between the Congregation for the Eastern Churches and the Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools was signed by the Prefect of the Congregation and the Superior General of the Institute, successor to the letters of agreement of 1973.

      • Principally, the agreement established that the Institute had responsibility to organize and administer the University and the Congregation, for its financial support.
      • The Rector of the University was mandated to form an advisory committee to be known as the Administrative Committee of Bethlehem University.
      • He was also instructed to prepare Statutes for the University, to be approved by both the Congregation and the Institute.
      • The agreement provided that the Congregation support the University financially either directly from the Good Friday collection or through organizations solicited for this purpose and promote the development of the University.
      • The agreement also adopted inclusively the articles of the 2 October 1973 contract.
      • Finally, the agreement was made for a term of five years, renewable for the same periods in the future.

Establishment of a Board of Trustees

On 1 October 1979 a [local, Bethlehem] “Bethlehem University Board of Trustees By-Laws” was signed by the President of the University [then Brother Joseph B. Loewenstein, F.S.C.] and the Chancellor [the Apostolic Delegate to Jerusalem]. It consisted of ten sections: Establishment, Number of Trustees, Composition of the Board of Trustees, Term of Office, Vacancies, Powers of the Board of Trustees, Meetings of the Board and Quorum, Chairman of the Board, Committees, and The President’s Council of Representatives.
The first section stated “The Board of Trustees is established by the Freres des Ecoles Chretiennes in consultation with the Apostolic Delegate of Jerusalem, the representative of the Holy See, to exercise the powers entrusted to it.”

Position of Vice Chancellor

At a later time, Brother Joseph Loewenstein, F.S.C., President of the University, by executive decision changed his title to Vice Chancellor, but retained the function of chief executive officer.

Publication of a “Statutes of Bethlehem University”

Later a document entitled “Statutes of Bethlehem University” was prepared, seemingly to harmonize all of the above. The document, sections of which were published in the catalogue of the University, consisted of seven sections: General Objectives, Statement of Policy, The Board of Trustees, Adjunct Associations, The Chancellor, The Vice Chancellor, and the President.
The section on the Board of Trustees referred vaguely and in summary fashion to the local, Bethlehem Board of Trustees described in the document of 1 October 1979.
A curious section on Adjunct Associations stated that “Two associations have been established outside the country whose main objective is to contribute morally and materially to the development and maintenance of Bethlehem University. It then described (1) L’Association en Faveur de la Bethlehem University and (2) Bethlehem University in the Holy Land.

Nomination of the first Arab President

On 21 February 1981 the Congregation for the Eastern Churches named the Rev. Dr. Michel Sabbah President of the University.

Admission into the Association of Arab Universities

On 27-30 April 1981 the University was admitted to membership in the Association of Arab Universities.

Amendment of the civil By-Laws

On 1 March 1982 the Board of Trustees of the civil Corporation met at the La Salle Provincialate in Lincroft, New Jersey. The Trustees amended the original By-Laws of the Corporation to substitute the title “Chief Administrative Officer of Bethlehem University” in the place of “President of Bethlehem University.” [who at that time was already called Vice Chancellor.]

Renewal of the formal agreement between the Congregation and the Institute

On 26 February 1985 a French language protocol of agreement, renewing the 4 May 1979 agreement, was signed by the Prefect of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches, and on 5 April 1985, by the Superior General of the Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools.

III

Further amendment of the civil By-Laws

On 10 August 1990 the Board of Trustees of the civil Corporation met at St. Mary’s College of California in Moraga, California. The Trustees amended the (1 March 1982 amended) By-Laws of the Corporation to provide that the Vice President of the Corporation should be the Vice President for Development of the University instead of the Executive Vice President of the University.
The Trustees also formally instructed the Vice Chancellor to work with the Secretary General of C.N.E.W.A. to clarify the relationship between the civil Board of Trustees of the Corporation and the local, Bethlehem Board of Trustees and to prepare appropriate legal documents.
[Brother John Johnson, Superior General of the Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools, previously had requested the assistance of Msgr. Robert Stern, a canonist and Secretary General of C.N.E.W.A., in resolving the relationships among the various agencies of governance and oversight of the University.]

Civil re-incorporation and adoption of By-Laws

On 2 October 1990 the University was re-incorporated in the State of New Jersey, this time as a membership corporation called “Bethlehem University in the Holy Land, Inc.” The purpose of the re-incorporation was to allow greater flexibility in the choosing of the Trustees.
The certificate of incorporation provided that the first Board of Trustees consist of five trustees: Brother Kevin Gilhooley, F.S.C.; Brother John Martin, F.S.C.; Brother Steven McCabe, F.S.C.; Brother Peter Mannion, F.S.C.; and Brother Jerome Sullivan, F.S.C., but did not include the requirement that the Board always be constituted by them or their successors in office.
On 23 May 1991 the first Board of Trustees of the re-incorporated civil Corporation met in Lincroft, New Jersey. The Trustees took three actions:

      • First, they adopted a By-Laws, which harmonized (1) the agreement between the Congregation for the Eastern Churches and the Brothers of the Christian Schools concerning the establishment, function, and development of the University; (2) the current By-Laws of the original civil Corporation; (3) the requirements of the Association of Arab Universities; (4) the requirements of the Council for Higher Education for the West Bank and Gaza; and (5) the two documents regulating the local, Bethlehem Board of Trustees: the “Bethlehem University Board of Trustees By-laws” and the later “Statutes of Bethlehem University.
      • Second, they elected a Vice-Chancellor, President, and Secretary in accordance with their new By-Laws.
      • Third, they passed a detailed resolution constituting a Bethlehem Advisory Board of Trustees, with functions and powers appropriately subordinated to the Board of Trustees of the Corporation.
      • The new By-Laws also provided that the Trustees of the Corporation be the Vice Chancellor of the University and the Provincials of the Brothers of the Christian Schools of the United States Region, ex officio.

Amendment of the By-Laws

On 12 October 1993 the Board of Trustees of the civil Corporation met at the Totino-Grace Renewal Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota and radically amended the By-Laws of the civil Corporation to incorporate all relevant provisions of the duly approved canonical Statutes of Bethlehem University.

New formal agreement between the Congregation and the Institute

On 2 September 1994 an English language agreement, replacing the agreement of 4 May 1979 and successive renewals of it, was signed by His Eminence Achille Cardinal Silvestrini, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches, and Brother John Johnston, F.S.C., the Superior General of the Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools. 
The agreement provided for the initial approval and subsequent emendation of a Statutes of Bethlehem University, redefined the responsibilities of the Congregation and the Institute, and reaffirmed both the procedure for nominating the Vice Chancellor and the agreement of 2 October 1973 concerning the ownership and use of the land and buildings of the university.

Approval of canonical Statutes

On that same date, 2 September 1994, a new Statutes of Bethlehem University were approved by His Eminence Achille Cardinal Silvestrini, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches, and Brother John Johnston, F.S.C., the Superior General of the Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools.
[The draft of the new Statutes of Bethlehem University previously had been reviewed by the Congregation for Catholic Education which affirmed that Bethlehem University was a Catholic university, notwithstanding the requirements of the apostolic constitution, Ex Corde Ecclesiae.]

Amendment of the canonical Statutes

On 17 January 1996, the Statutes of Bethlehem University were amended with the approval of the Prefect of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches and the Superior General of the Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools.

Further amendment of the canonical Statutes

 On 21 January 2003, the Statutes of Bethlehem University again were amended with the approval of the Prefect of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches and the Superior General of the Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools.

Pontifical Mission at 50

“Holy Father, you should know that they are all fiercely proud of working for you and overjoyed to be here with you,” I said to Pope John Paul II after he had greeted the last member of our Pontifical Mission staff.
I was standing next to the Pope in the Consistorial Hall of the Apostolic Palace and had just presented to him by name each staff member from our Amman, Beirut, Jerusalem, and Vatican City offices and 22 staff members from the joint New York headquarters of the Pontifical Mission and CNEWA.


Why me? Besides being CNEWA’s Secretary General, I am also President of the Pontifical Mission — originally the Pontifical Mission for Palestine and now the Holy See’s relief and development agency for the entire Middle East.
We were in Rome to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Pontifical Mission’s establishment and 50 years of its good work. The day had begun with a solemn Mass of Thanksgiving offered by Achille Cardinal Silvestrini, Prefect of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches, at the Altar of the Chair in St. Peter’s Basilica.
In the aftermath of the violence and bloodshed that followed the United Nation’s partition of Palestine, the Pontifical Mission was conceived as an instrumentality of the love and concern of the Holy Father and of the whole Catholic world for the hundreds of thousands of displaced persons and refugees.
At its start in June 1949, the Pontifical Mission coordinated the relief efforts of the local and international church in Egypt, Gaza, Israel, Arab Palestine, Transjordan, Syria, and Lebanon.
The early years saw the provision of emergency shelter and distribution of food, clothing, and medicine to the refugees. As no resolution to their plight appeared, the Mission provided institutional services such as schools, clinics, and homes for the handicapped, the orphaned, the aged and the infirm.
With the Israeli occupation of the rest of Palestine in 1967, the Pontifical Mission began to respond to the needs of an entire civilian population living under martial law and without normal social institutions. It also had to face a new refugee crisis and emergency needs in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.
The woes of the Middle East continued.  With the increase of civil strife in Lebanon, our beneficiaries were no longer just Palestinian but Lebanese as well.
The start of the intifida in 1987 offered new challenges for our work in the Holy Land. Now the Mission aided grassroots organizations providing medical assistance, agricultural aid, legal advocacy, and other vital services to the Palestinian people.
The 1991 Gulf War brought waves of Iraqi refugees to Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon. Again, the love and concern of the Holy Father reached out to them through the Mission’s work.
Would that after 50 years there were no need for a special relief and development agency of the Holy See. Alas, it’s services are still needed and still continue — through the generosity of the donors of CNEWA; the Swiss-German Kinderhilfe Bethlehem; Kindermissionswerk, Misereor, Missio, and the Archdiocese of Cologne in Germany; and other Catholic agencies throughout the world.
Why did we celebrate this 50th anniversary? On the down side, it’s half a century of war, violence, dispossession, and human suffering. But on the up side it is a wonderful record of love, concern, and international solidarity with the afflicted peoples of the Middle East.
During these 50 years, more than $150,000,000 was raised — for the most part from individual donors — and expended in the Middle East in the name of the Holy Father.
The Secretariat of State of the Holy See encouraged a public observance of this charitable work of the Pope. These celebrations provided an opportunity for witness and testimony to the Church’s presence and concern for justice and peace in the Holy Land and throughout the Middle East.
The first celebration of the Mission’s anniversary took place in New York at the United Nations Headquarter on 25 October. The event there, of course, had an international character; it also offered an opportunity to many benefactors to participate.
On 26 November the anniversary was appropriately observed in Palestine itself in the “little town” of Bethlehem, the birthplace of the Lord whose love and teachings inspire the Mission’s work.
The next day the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan celebrated this beautiful work of the Holy See in favor of not only Palestinian refugees but also of needy Jordanians.
Lebanon was the site of the third and final Middle East observance of the 50th anniversary, the country where presently the Pontifical Mission conducts its largest scale program — the restoration of village infrastructure and the return of displaced villagers to their homes.
Lastly and appropriately we gathered around the Holy Father himself in Rome. Yes, we are all fiercely proud of working for him — and I’m fiercely proud of you, whose love and generosity makes all this good work possible.


(Published as
“The Pontifical Mission at 50” in
Catholic Near East, 26:1, January 2000)

Pontifical Mission’s Pontifical Mission

It was around April 1986. At the time, Msgr. John G. Nolan, Secretary General of Catholic Near East Welfare Association, was President of the Pontifical Mission for Palestine. I was his special assistant.
He asked me to brief Sister Maureen Grady, C.S.C., who was about to take over the position of director of the Pontifical Mission’s Beirut office.
Professionally, Sister Maureen was a registered nurse and pastoral health care educator. She was used to precision and definition in her work.
“May I have a copy of my job description?” she asked.
“Your job is Director of the Beirut office,” I told her.
“Yes,” she replied, “I understand that, but don’t you have a detailed listing of the principal responsibilities of the position?”
“No,” I replied, “but we can draw one up.” And, so we did.
Then Sister Maureen asked for the organization’s Mission Statement. I told her that we didn’t have that either, but I suggested that her first task in her new position could be to help me create it.
“Create” is not the right word, for it means to make something out of nothing. Actually what we did was to extract the statement needed from documents of the Holy See relating to the foundation and work of the Pontifical Mission.
Our starting point was the decision of Pope Pius XII in 1949 “to bring together under the Pontifical Mission, operating in the Holy Land, all those organizations and associations which are engaged in activities concerning the East, and which are scattered throughout many countries of Europe and other continents.”

Naturally the first item in our draft was the work of the Mission in providing emergency help and relief to Palestinian refugees, without regard to creed.
As the problems of the Holy Land and the Palestinians continued without resolution, the Pontifical Mission’s work became more institutionalized and embraced support of social service institutions and rehabilitation of homes.
On its 25th anniversary in 1974, Pope Paul VI had urged the Pontifical Mission to continue its work “without distinction of nationality,” extending its mandate to all those who suffer in the Middle East.
Optimistically, he felt that the time of relief and rehabilitation was near its end. The Mission could now concentrate on projects of human development. Of course, it did not become a matter of one or the other but of both.
We concluded by describing the mission of the Mission as fivefold:

1. Emergency assistance and relief
2. Care and rehabilitation
3. Education and human development
4. Collaboration and service to other agencies
5. Advocacy and public awareness

It’s 50 years later. The needs are still there. The Pontifical Mission continues. The love that drives it does too.


(Published in
Catholic Near East, 25:2, March 1999)

Pontifical Mission History

I.  HISTORICAL OVERVIEW

Immediately after the adoption on 29 November 1947 by the General Assembly of the United Nations of a plan for the partition of Palestine, hostilities erupted began. This situation brought affliction and keen anxiety to the heart of the Holy Father, Pope Pius XII.((Pope Pius XII, encyclical letter Auspicia quaedam, 1 May 1948, #12)) In his encyclical letter Auspicia quaedam, of 1 May 1948 on public prayers for world peace and the solution of the problems of Palestine, Pope Pius asked for supplications “that the situation in Palestine may at long last be settled justly and thereby concord and peace be also happily established.”((Ibid., #14))
When the British High Commissioner left Palestine on 14 May 1948, the State of Israel was proclaimed and Arab armies crossed into Palestine. As hostilities continued in the following months, Pope Pius was deeply concerned. He published another encyclical letter, In multiplicibus curis, on 24 October 1948, concerning prayers for peace in Palestine. The Pope expressed sorrow “that, in the land in which our Lord Jesus Christ shed His blood to bring redemption and salvation to all mankind, the blood of man continues to flow; and that beneath the skies which echoed on that fateful night with the Gospel tidings of peace, men continue to fight and to increase the distress of the unfortunate and the fear of the terrorized, while thousands of refugees, homeless and driven, wander from their fatherland in search of shelter and food.”((Pope Pius XII, encyclical letter In multiplicibus curis, 24 October 1948, #1))

Pope Pius XII’s relief initiatives

Pius XII, “without abandoning the attitude of impartiality,”((Ibid., #4)) did his utmost to attain justice and peace in Palestine.((Ibid.)) He sought to come to the aid of the victims of the war by sending the resources at his disposal to his representatives in Palestine, Lebanon and Egypt for this purpose, and by encouraging the formation among Catholics in various countries of undertakings organized for the same purpose.((Ibid., #5))
In February of 1949, when an armistice came into effect, Pope Pius continued to demonstrate his concern for the plight of the Palestinian people and the status of the Holy Places. In his encyclical letter Redemptoris nostri cruciatus of 15 April 1949 he said “piteous appeals still reach us from numerous refugees, of every age and condition, who have been forced by the disastrous war to emigrate and even live in exile in concentration camps, the prey to destitution, contagious disease and perils of every sort.”((Pope Pius XII, encyclical letter Redemptoris nostri cruciatus, 15 April 1949, #5))

Establishment of the Mission

During the preceding months, the Holy Father had been studying the efforts of the Church among the refugees with a view to unifying all the work of humanitarian and charitable assistance of the Holy See into one overall pontifical agency. In April 1949, Pope Pius summoned to Rome Monsignor Thomas J. McMahon, the National Secretary of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association. The pope informed him of his intention to organize a special mission for Palestine and named him its president.((“A presiedere questa Missione e stato chiamato l’Ill.mo e Rev.mo Mons. Tommaso Mc Mahon, persona ben nota nel campo della carita verso l’Oriente, essendo il Segretario Nazionale della Catholic Near East Welfare Association, negli Stati Uniti.” (Eugene Cardinal Tisserant, Secretary, Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church, Istruzione, 18 June 1949) ))
On 18 June 1949, Eugene Cardinal Tisserant, Secretary of the Sacred Congregation for the Oriental Church, published an Istruzione announcing that the Holy Father had erected a Pontifical Mission for Palestine((“Il Santo Padre, nel Suo vivo interessamento per la Palestina e tutti coloro che hanno particolarmente subito le conseguenze della guerra che vi si e svolta, Si e compiaciuto erigere una “MISSIONE PONTIFICIA PRO PALESTINA.” (Ibid.) )) and outlining its competence: “…it has been decided to bring together under the Pontifical Mission, operating in the Holy Land, all those organizations and associations which are engaged in activities concerning the East, and which are scattered throughout many countries of Europe and other continents.”((“..si e deliberato di stringere intorno alla Missione Pontificia – operante in Terra Santa – tutte quelle opere ed associazioni che esplicano una attivita a favore dell’Oriente e sono sparse in numerosi Stati di Europa e degli altri continenti.” (Ibid.) ))
Later, Pope Pius named Canon Jules Creten, rector of the archdiocesan seminary of Malines, as secretary of the Mission, and he approved the nomination of Father Raphael Kratzer, O.F.M., as assistant to the president. The field headquarters of the Pontifical Mission was established in Beirut. Later, offices were established in Jerusalem and in Amman.(( “La Missione Pontificia – come e ovvio – avra la sua sede centrale in Palestina e svolgera la propria attivita in quella regione e negli Stati confinanti o vicini, per far giungere ad ogni profugo e bisognoso palestinese la carita del Papa e di tutti i cattolici del mondo.” (Ibid.) ))

Early organization and operations

Seven local Pontifical Mission committees involving the papal representative, hierarchy, clergy, laity, and charitable agencies were organized for Arab Palestine, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Trans- Jordan, Israel, and Gaza.  Additionally, further central administrative and field staff were recruited.
The Mission began to function as the liaison of the Holy See with the agencies of the United Nations and expanded the services of Catholic personnel to the same. It also served as liaison with the other voluntary agencies working in the area.
In the years that followed, the Pontifical Mission not only distributed many tons of food, clothing, medical supplies, temporary shelters, and cooking equipment to the newly dispossessed, but also constructed homes for those who had lost their own.((“The rapid and providential intervention of the Mission after the recent conflict led to distribution of many tons of food, clothing, medical supplies, temporary shelter and cooking equipment to the newly dispossessed, as well as the construction of homes for those who had lost their own.” (A.G. Cardinal Cicognani, Secretary of State of His Holiness, letter to the Right Reverend Monsignor John G. Nolan, President, Pontifical Mission for Palestine, 8 April 1968) )) An outstanding achievement of the Pontifical Mission was its encouragement and endowment of training and educational programs to enable the refugees to help themselves through newly acquired skills and trades and to accede to literacy and higher schooling.(( “Over the past nineteen years, the outstanding achievement of the Mission has been its encouragement and endowment of training and educational programs, to enable the refugees to help themselves through newly acquired skills and trades, and to accede to literacy and higher schooling.” (Ibid.) ))

Pope Paul VI’s concern

In October 1963, a few months after his election to the papacy, Paul VI, expressing his personal appreciation of and identification with the work of the Pontifical Mission, wrote to its president that ”We esteem highly the efforts and admirable achievements of that Mission, which we helped establish….”((Pope Paul VI, autographed letter to Our Beloved Son, Joseph T. Ryan, Our Domestic Prelate, President of the Pontifical Commission for Palestine, 7 October 1963)) He exhorted relief agencies everywhere to collaborate with the Mission, addressing in particular the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, Catholic Relief Services, the Custody of the Holy Land, and the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre.((“We exhort relief agencies everywhere to assist your Mission in accomplishing its important work; and, in this regard, We address particularly those bodies to whom this appeal was made from the beginning: the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, Catholic Relief Services – National Catholic Welfare Conference, the Custody of the Holy Land, and the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre.” (Ibid.) ))
Pope Paul VI went on pilgrimage to the Holy Land in January 1964. His vivid and personal experiences there prompted him to call for new, important and creative initiatives on behalf of Palestinians and the Church in Palestine. On 25 March 1974 in the encyclical letter on the increased needs of the Church in the Holy Land, Nobis in animo, the pope spoke of “the grave religious, political and social problems existing in the Holy Land: the complex and delicate problems of the coexistence of the peoples of the region, of their living in peace, and questions of a religious, civil and human nature which involve the life of the different communities that live in the Holy Land.”((Pope Paul VI, encyclical letter Nobis in animo, 25 March 1974))
Pope Paul warned that “the continuation of the state of tension in the Middle East, without conclusive steps towards peace having been taken, constitutes a serious and constant danger. This danger imperils not only the peace and security of the people there–and the peace of the whole world–but also threatens certain values which for various reasons are supremely dear to such a great part of mankind.”((Ibid.))

 New directions

On the occasion of the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Pontifical Mission for Palestine in 1974, Paul VI cited its work as “one of the clearest signs of the Holy See’s concern for the welfare of the Palestinians, who are particularly dear to us because they are the people of the Holy Land, because they include followers of Christ and because they have been and still are being so tragically tried.”((Pope Paul VI, autographed letter to Our Beloved Son, John G. Nolan, President of the Pontifical Mission for Palestine, 16 July 1974 )) He expressed again “our heartfelt sharing in their sufferings and our support for their legitimate aspirations.”((Ibid.))
Pope Paul gave new impetus and new dimensions to the work of the Pontifical Mission.  “Our Mission for Palestine is thus about to be faced with a compelling task. In addition to continuing its assistance, without distinction of nationality or religion, to those who have suffered or are suffering in any way as a result of repeated conflicts which have devastated that region, the Mission will now have to expect, in the situation which is now evolving, to contribute to projects of aid, of rehabilitation and of development for the population of Palestine.”((Ibid.)) He again called for promotion in the Catholic world of “an effective collaboration between all the relief organizations concerned with Palestine.”((Ibid.))

Contemporary challenges

As violence and warfare increased in Lebanon, the Pontifical Mission became increasingly involved in assistance to those suffering there.  It provided emergency assistance and basic necessities to Lebanese and other peoples dispossessed, displaced, or otherwise affected by regional conflicts and acts of violence, and assisted in the repair of damaged educational, charitable, and religious institutions.
From the beginning of the first intifada in Palestine the Pontifical Mission supplied emergency medical supplies, medical equipment and personnel, agricultural supplies, and assistance to families and schools.
Because of its modest administrative structure, its non-governmental nature, and the confidence it enjoys among the local churches, the Pontifical Mission is able to act quickly, expeditiously, and effectively to alleviate human suffering and aid human development.  It concentrates especially on trying to meet those needs that are either too limited to be addressed by larger agencies or which fall outside of their funding guidelines.

II.  PURPOSE AND GOALS

The Pontifical Mission for Palestine is a specialized agency of the Holy See established by Pope Pius XII in 1949.((“Il Santo Padre, nel Suo vivo interessamento per la Palestina e tutti coloro che hanno particolarmente subito le conseguenze della guerra che vi si e svolta, Si e compiaciuto erigere una “MISSIONE PONTIFICIA PRO PALESTINA.” (Tisserant, op. cit.) )) Its purpose is to assist, without distinction of nationality or religion, all those who suffer because of the repeated conflicts which have devastated Palestine and neighboring regions of the Middle East.
The Pontifical Mission encourages and supports projects and programs of emergency assistance and relief; care and rehabilitation; education and human development; collaboration and service to other agencies; and advocacy and public awareness.((“Our Mission for Palestine is thus about to be faced with a compelling task.  In addition to continuing its assistance, without distinction of nationality or religion, to those who have suffered or are suffering in any way as a result of the repeated conflicts which have devastated that region, the Mission will have to expect, in the situation which is now evolving, to contribute to projects of aid, of rehabilitation and of development…” (Pope Paul VI, autographed letter to Our Beloved Son, John G. Nolan, op. cit.) ))

Emergency assistance and relief

The Pontifical Mission provides food, clothing, medical assistance, temporary shelter, and other basic necessities for the relief of Palestinians and neighboring peoples of the Middle East dispossessed, displaced, or otherwise affected by war, regional conflict, or discrimination.((“…continuing charitable works: collections of clothes, food, medicines, money….” (Tisserant, op. cit.)
“For the past fourteen years, the Pontifical Commission for Palestine has carried on this noble apostolate, by providing spiritual and material relief for the victims of war in the Holy Land.” (Pope Paul VI, autographed letter to Our Beloved Son, Joseph T. Ryan, op. cit.)
“…the Catholic Near East Welfare ssociation…provides most of the means of alleviating the pains of the homeless.  The rapid and providential intervention of the Mission after the recent conflict led to distribution of many tons of food, clothing medical supplies, temporary shelter and cooking equipment to the newly dispossessed…” (Cicognani, op. cit.) ))

Care and rehabilitation

The Pontifical Mission repairs and reconstructs homes and educational, medical, charitable, religious, and cultural facilities and institutions in the Middle East damaged by war or other acts of violence.
It establishes, equips, and maintains programs, facilities, and institutions for the care of orphaned and needy children, the physically and mentally handicapped, the sick, the indigent, the homeless, and the aged.((“Orphans and the blind are cared for and trained…” (Cicognani, op. cit.) ))
It assists educational, medical, charitable, and cultural societies and institutions organized for such purposes.

Education and human development

The Pontifical Mission encourages and endows educational programs and institutions to enable the poor and the oppressed to help themselves through the acquisition of skills and trades, literacy, and higher schooling.((“…the outstanding achievement of the Mission has been its encouragement and endowment of training and educational programs, to able the refugees to help themselves through newly acquired skills and trades, and to accede to literacy and higher schooling….a fine library provides opportunities for useful reading and reunions.” (Cicognani, op. cit.) ))
It provides counseling for community and individual development projects and programs.
It makes loans and grants for small businesses and self-help projects.

Collaboration and service

The Pontifical Mission collaborates in projects and programs with organizations committed to objectives similar to its own in order to achieve them more effectively while avoiding duplication and competition.((“We have followed with personal interest this activity in the various forms which it has taken to meet the grave and multiple needs of the refugees, often in coordination with the activity which other organizations, including those which are not Catholic, have commendably carried out” (Pope Paul VI, autographed letter to Our Beloved Son, John G. Nolan, op. cit.) ))
It promotes effective coordination, especially in the Catholic world, among those organizations and associations concerned with assistance to the Middle East.((“…it has been decided to bring together under the Pontifical Mission…all those organizations and associations which are engaged in activities concerning the East, and which are scattered throughout many countries of Europe and other continents….” (Cicognani, op. cit.)
“We exhort relief agencies everywhere to assist your Mission in accomplishing its important work; and, in this regard, We address particularly those bodies to whom this appeal was made from the beginning: the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, Catholic Relief Services – National Catholic Welfare Conference, the Custody of the Holy Land, and the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre.” (Pope Paul VI, autographed letter to Our Beloved Son, Joseph T. Ryan, op. cit.)
“…it will be necessary to promote in the Catholic world an effective collaboration between all the relief organizations concerned with Palestine.” (Pope Paul VI, autographed letter to Our Beloved Son, John G. Nolan, opcit.) ))

Advocacy and public awareness

The Pontifical Mission publicizes and arouses interest in the problems of the Middle East and in the needs and rights of the Palestinian and neighboring peoples by studies, publications, conferences, seminars, religious functions, and other means of social communication.(( “…this activity should consist in…publicizing and arousing interest in the problem of Palestine and the holy places, by studies, articles, conferences, religious functions, etc….” (Cicognani, op. cit.)
“We therefore exhort you and your collaborators to become the voice of those who are suffering, and to urge Christians to be generous witnesses of charity towards their Palestinian brethren of the Holy Land – as we have already indicated in our Exhortation Nobis in Animo – and to intensify their efforts for the worthy cause of assistance and development.” (Pope Paul VI, autographed letter to Our Beloved Son, John G. Nolan, op. cit.) ))

III.  ADMINISTRATION

President

The president of the Pontifical Mission is appointed by the Holy Father.  The president is the chief executive officer of the Pontifical Mission. He is responsible for supervising, directing, and furthering its activities and staff; for representing it vis-a-vis ecclesiastical and civil authorities; for soliciting funds for its operations; for improving and augmenting its projects; and for initiating others as needed.

Vice President

The Vice President is the chief operating officer of the Pontifical Mission.  He is responsible for directing its operations, under the supervision of the President, in support of the approved mission, plans and policies. The Vice President guides and directs the regional office directors.

Regional Directors

Each regional office of the Pontifical Mission has a Regional Director who is appointed by the President to serve for such term as he may determine. Each regional director transacts, under the direction of the Vice President, all the routine business of the regional office and puts into effect the policies and regulations of the Pontifical Mission.

IV.  OFFICES

Vatican office

As a specialized agency of the Holy See, the Pontifical Mission maintains a office in the Vatican.

New York office

Its principal administrative office is located within the Archdiocese of New York, attached to the Catholic Near East Welfare Association.

Regional offices

The Pontifical Mission has regional offices in places where it conducts its field activities.  Presently it has offices in Beirut, Jerusalem, and Amman.

ENDNOTES

Georgia on My Mind

In response to an invitation extended by Mr. Eduard Shevardnadze, Georgia’s head of state, Cardinal Achille Silvestrini, Prefect of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches, led a small Vatican delegation to Georgia.
Other members included Msgr. Claudio Gugerotti, Official of the Congregation for the Eastern Churches; Father Angelo Brusco, O.S.Cam., Superior General of the Order of St. Camillus; Mr. Francesco Carloni of Caritas Italiana; and Msgr. Robert Stern, Secretary General of Catholic Near East Welfare Association.
The overall purposes of the trip were to call upon civil and ecclesiastical authorities and to make pastoral visits to representative small Catholic communities. A special purpose was to explore the feasibility of building a multipurpose health clinic in Tbilisi to be staffed by the Camillian Fathers and placed at the service of the people of Georgia in the name of the pope.

General Description

Georgia and its neighboring republics of Armenia and Azerbaijan, separated from Russia by the Caucasus Mountains, historically have been a frontier between Europe and Asia. A part of the Russian and Soviet empires since the 18th century, Georgia declared its independence again in 1990.
Covering an area of 26,900 square miles, Georgia has a population of 5,400,000 according to its 1989 census. Its capital, Tbilisi, has 1,300,000 inhabitants.
Descendants of ancient tribes, ethnic Georgians are unrelated to the Russians and other Slavs and make up 70 percent of the population. Over 80 other nationalities live in Georgia, including Abkhazians, Armenians, Ossetians, and Russians.

History

Known to the ancient Greeks as Colchis, the mythical land to which Jason voyaged to find the Golden Fleece, Georgia was conquered by Pompey in 66 B.C. and brought into the Roman sphere. It remained firmly allied with Rome for almost three centuries.
Georgia’s independence from Rome dates from the Roman recognition of Mirian III as the King of Kartli-Iberia (eastern Georgia) in 298 A.D. He became a Christian and made Christianity the official religion of his kingdom in 337. By the 6th century, Christianity was the state religion in Colchis (western Georgia) as well.
In 645, the Arabs captured Tbilisi and installed an emir there to rule in the name of the caliph. Arab rule weakened with the expansion of the Byzantine empire. By 1027 the Georgian kingdoms were a united and independent power in the Caucasus.
The Seljuk Turks from Central Asia defeated the Byzantines and controlled the area for 50 years. They were finally defeated in 1122 by the Georgian king, David the Builder. This victory ushered in Georgia’s Golden Age.
In the 13th century the Mongols invaded Georgia more than once and dominated it for over 100 years. After briefly repulsing Mongol rule, the Georgian kingdom was again invaded and conquered in 1386.
After repeated invasions and conquests by Mongols, Ottoman Turks, and Persians, the Georgian king sought Russian protection in 1783. Georgia was annexed by Russia in 1800.
In 1918, Georgia declared itself an independent republic, but in 1921 the Red Army invaded and it was once again annexed by Russia.

Political Conflict

After a declaration of Georgian sovereignty on 9 March 1990, elections were held in October. Mr. Zviad Gamsakhurdia, a historian, became the chairman of parliament. However he was accused of establishing a dictatorship and overthrown by a military coup in January 1992. Mr. Eduard Shevardnadze returned to Georgia from Moscow a few months later and was elected chairman of parliament and head of state on 11 October 1992.
In September 1993 bitter fighting broke out between supporters of Gamsakhurdia and the new government that continued until last November.

Ethnic Conflict: South Ossetia

South Ossetia is a small mountainous region near the Russian border, north of Tbilisi. Two-thirds of its 100,000 people are ethnic Ossetians, traditionally allied with Russia. Civil conflict started there in 1989. In 1990 the South Ossetians, then living in an autonomous region within Georgia, declared their land to be a sovereign republic. In December 1991 they proclaimed their independence.
After intense fighting, a cease-fire was signed in June 1992 and is still in force, although there is still no final resolution to the conflict.

Ethnic Conflict: Abkhazia

Abkhazia, a region on the Black Sea in northwestern Georgia, was originally populated by a distinct ethnic group, the Abkhaz, most of whom embraced Islam in the 16th century.
After the Bolsheviks took over Georgia in 1921, Abkhazia became a sovereign socialist republic. In 1930, it was reduced to an autonomous republic within Georgia, and Georgian immigration was encouraged.
The Abkhaz people and leadership felt their land was becoming Georgian and losing its identity. By August 1992, when Abkhazian separatists declared an independent republic, precipitating civil war, the Abkhaz numbered only 18 percent of the population; 46 percent were Georgian.
Presently there is an uneasy truce. Russia has asked the UN to approve its troops as peacekeepers in the area. As a result of the fighting, an estimated 150,000 Georgians and other non-Abkhazian peoples, approximately 30 percent of the total population of Abkhazia, fled for their lives. Almost 50,000 live as refugees in Tbilisi.

Social and Economic Conditions

Approximately 250,000 people, 4.6 percent of the total population of Georgia, are displaced due to the civil conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Most live in great poverty, having lost their lands and possessions when they fled for their lives.
With the demise of the Soviet Union, the economy of Georgia, as that of other republics of the former U.S.S.R., has collapsed. Previously a privileged Soviet republic, Georgia is now almost destitute.
Living conditions have deteriorated drastically. Uncontrolled inflation has made the scrip used as currency almost worthless.
The average monthly wage is about 75 cents. Meanwhile, the cost of food for a small family costs approximately $25 a month. Many people are reduced to selling or bartering their possessions for food.
Before the collapse of the centralized Soviet economy, Georgia had processing plants for mineral water and tea leaves, breweries, and silk and textile factories. Now most of the Georgian factories and plants are not in operation.
Reportedly, corruption is rampant and organized crime controls a black-market and much of the popular economy.

The Church of Georgia

The great missionary of Georgia is St. Nino of Cappadocia. Originally the church in eastern Georgia used the liturgy of St. James and was dependent on the Antiochene patriarchate, until it became independent in 467.
The church in western Georgia used the Byzantine liturgy. With the unification of the two kingdoms and the establishment of one catholicosate in 1008, the Byzantine liturgy was followed by all.
After Georgia was annexed by Russia, the Georgian catholicosate was abolished. From 1811 until 1917, when the Georgian church again declared itself autocephalous, it was administered by a special exarch of the Russian Orthodox Church.
During the Soviet period, both the Russian and the Georgian Orthodox churches suffered. Of the 2,455 churches open in Georgia until 1917, only 80 were open until just a few years ago.
Traditionally almost all Georgians are Orthodox, although, after 80 years of communism, the actual level of religious formation and practice is very low. In 1988 a new Theological Academy, or seminary, was allowed to be opened in Tbilisi. Under the leadership of the present Catholicos-Patriarch of All Georgia, Ilia II, a renewal of the church has begun.

Catholics in Georgia

From the Middle Ages, Latin (Roman) Catholic missionaries proselytized Orthodox Christians in Georgia periodically. In 1329 a Latin bishopric was established in Tbilisi, which later lapsed. By the time Georgia was incorporated into the Russian empire, it had about 50,000 Latin Catholics in addition to scattered communities of Armenian Catholics.
During most of the Soviet period, the remnants of these Catholic communities were totally isolated and had no clergy to minister to them. Presently, there are two Latin Catholic priests caring for the one Catholic church open in Tbilisi, two Latin Catholic priests providing pastoral care to a few Latin Catholic villages, and two Armenian Catholic priests caring for the few Armenian Catholic villages in Georgia.
Three years ago the Holy See named an ordinary for Armenian Catholics in Eastern Europe, who resides in Armenia.
Last year the Holy See appointed an apostolic nuncio to Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia who resides in Tbilisi and also serves as apostolic administrator for Latin Catholics in the Caucasus.

Parish Encounters

In the course of our visit, Cardinal Silvestrini celebrated two public Masses in Tbilisi, one in Sts. Peter and Paul Church and the other in the convent chapel of the Missionaries of Charity. Enthusiastic crowds jammed both.
When the delegation visited the Armenian Catholic village of Shvilisi, it was greeted in the traditional way with two young people in traditional dress bearing bread and salt. Dozens of children lined the entrance to the village with flowers. An outdoor assembly of hundreds of persons organized by the two Armenian Catholic sisters working in the village awaited the group in the village center.
Afterward, Archbishop Nerses der Nersessian celebrated an Armenian liturgy in the church at which the cardinal presided. The local Georgian Orthodox bishop attended the liturgy and a festive meal that followed.
In the small Latin Catholic village of Arali, Cardinal Silvestrini celebrated a Mass on an improvised altar outside the village church. There were too many people to fit inside. Rapt, weathered faces of old folk who had endured long years without sacraments were fixed on the cardinal. The occasional showers did not dampen their enthusiasm, their heartfelt prayers or their glad songs.


(Published in
Catholic Near East, 20:4, July 1994)